2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical advantage of crossed random intercepts under Bayesian hierarchical modeling to tackle unobserved heterogeneity in clustering critical versus non-critical crashes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, some other contributing factors, including driver's fault and action at the time of the crash, are potentially available in detail as part of the crash reports, so we could extract them in order to develop more reliable models using them as descriptive variables in future studies. Statistically more advanced models, such as Bayesian hierarchical regression models [77], could also be applied in future work to observe and account for heterogeneity. The effectiveness of driver education, especially through supervised practice [78] before independent driving licensure and licensing policies are two primary preventive counter-measures that may help decrease young-driver crash risks, which is a good direction for future work.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some other contributing factors, including driver's fault and action at the time of the crash, are potentially available in detail as part of the crash reports, so we could extract them in order to develop more reliable models using them as descriptive variables in future studies. Statistically more advanced models, such as Bayesian hierarchical regression models [77], could also be applied in future work to observe and account for heterogeneity. The effectiveness of driver education, especially through supervised practice [78] before independent driving licensure and licensing policies are two primary preventive counter-measures that may help decrease young-driver crash risks, which is a good direction for future work.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the considered SMoS, speed harmonization in four WZ areas has been investigated under varying CV-MPRs. Speed harmonization plays a crucial role in road safety by reducing speed variability and alleviating crash-prone conditions ( 88 92 ). During the simulation run, the speeds of individual vehicles in the traffic stream were observed using several data collection points located at 0.1 mi intervals in all individual WZ areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interstate-80 (I-80) in Wyoming is a rural corridor with a relatively low volume of traffic that mostly operates at Level of Service A or B. I-80 is characterized by high truck volumes and continual adverse weather conditions, including foggy conditions, imposing significant safety concerns (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). In line with the Connected Vehicle Pilot Deployment program on I-80 in Wyoming (Wyoming DOT CV Pilot) (27), this study investigates the safety performance of CVs on rural WZs during limited visibility caused by foggy conditions using VISSIM microsimulation modeling based on four sequential areas, including the advance warning, transition, activity, and termination area (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a general perspective, three factors contribute to this socioeconomic concern: the human factor, environmental conditions, and vehicle characteristics ( 3 , 4 ). Although it is known that the human is the most influential crash contributing factor, vehicle characteristics and maneuverability also influence crash severity ( 5 – 8 ). Statistics showed that heavy truck crashes are more severe than passenger car collisions, imposing serious safety concerns for transportation agencies, specifically on rural highways with ascending heavy vehicle traffic volume such as Interstate-80 (I-80) in Wyoming ( 7 , 9 , 10 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%