2022
DOI: 10.14218/jctp.2022.00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Issues of Ki-67 Evaluation in Breast Cancer Clinical Practice

Abstract: For the past several decades, markers of cellular proliferation in breast cancer have been postulated to indicate prognosis and predict benefits from antineoplastic therapies. The most common method to measure cellular proliferation by Ki-67 is immunohistochemistry (IHC) based assays. However, analytical issues have hindered the widespread adoption of these measures in patient care. The recent monarch E clinical trial prospectively investigated Ki-67 as a biomarker of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKI), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, any method of assessment needs to be developed following biomarkers standard procedures, including, in particular in this setting, validation in its ability to predict longterm outcomes. Second, currently available biomarkers in this setting, vastly depend on Ki67 which is, as discussed, far from being a reproducible biomarker [29,30,63,64]. Third, multiple gene-expression platforms have demonstrated high utility and reproducibility in ER+/HER2-BC both for molecular subtype and prognosis assessment [32,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, any method of assessment needs to be developed following biomarkers standard procedures, including, in particular in this setting, validation in its ability to predict longterm outcomes. Second, currently available biomarkers in this setting, vastly depend on Ki67 which is, as discussed, far from being a reproducible biomarker [29,30,63,64]. Third, multiple gene-expression platforms have demonstrated high utility and reproducibility in ER+/HER2-BC both for molecular subtype and prognosis assessment [32,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ki67 evaluation is not a reproducible parameter across laboratories (e.g. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) and others do not recommend their use to guide routine clinical care [27,29,30]). Moreover, mPEPI and Ki67 are not independent parameters as PEPI calculation takes into account Ki67 levels, among others [28]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a significantly higher expression in BRCA-positive breast cancer [48,49]. It implies its potential as an efficient prognostic factor in BRCA-positive breast cancer and future therapeutic implications in the context of emerging data suggest it might be advantageous to promote, rather than hinder, cell proliferation for immunotherapy to be optimally effective [50,51].…”
Section: Molecular Subtypes Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%