2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06944-4_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Non-interactive Publicly Verifiable Secret Sharing with Thousands of Parties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very relevant recent work is the VSS protocol of Gentry et al [22]. That work is motivated similarly to ours, namely, they aim at feasible threshold protocols for the YOSO model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A very relevant recent work is the VSS protocol of Gentry et al [22]. That work is motivated similarly to ours, namely, they aim at feasible threshold protocols for the YOSO model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To support very large committees with tens of thousands of participants, the scheme's communication and computation need to be sufficiently efficient. To this end, Gentry et al [52] proposed a non-interactive PVSS scheme based on the LWE. To further save bandwidth, they use the PVW encryption scheme in the multi-receiver setting along with bulletproofs to obtain compact proofs of correct share encryption and decryption.…”
Section: Lattice-based Vssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the SCRAPE [8] and ALBATROSS [9] PVSS schemes have significantly improved on the complexity of such schemes by making the share validity check and reconstructions procedures cheaper than previous works. While these works are based on number theoretical assumptions, a recent work has shown how to efficiently build PVSS from lattice based assumptions [17]. These works are not fit for the YOSO model because they require the parties to know the identities (or rather the public keys) of the parties receiving the shares when checking share validity, precluding (re)sharing towards anonymous parties.…”
Section: Rpirmentioning
confidence: 99%