2022
DOI: 10.22323/2.21020205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practicing engaged research through pandemic times: do not feed the animals?

Abstract: From ‘Feed the Birds’ to ‘Do Not Feed the Animals’ takes an engaged approach in which science communication is both process and outcome of the research. The project started in the UK in March 2020, coinciding with government-imposed lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; since the project’s engagement had been designed around in-person interactions, a rapid and creative rethink was needed. This paper outlines the redesign of the project and describes a hybrid model of on-line and in-person engagement,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(p. 5) Another group of JCOM authors looked at how participatory science communication can achieve a level of interaction between scientists and publics that goes beyond valuing participants' knowledge and experience. Thomas and Cassidy (2022) recognise the democratic potential of participatory science communication, describing it as "engaged research", quoting Holliman et al (2015): "researchers meaningfully interact with various stakeholders over any or all stages of a research process, from issue formulation through the production or co-production of new knowledge, to knowledge evaluation and dissemination" (p. 1).…”
Section: Postulating a Ladder Of "Participatory Science Communication"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. 5) Another group of JCOM authors looked at how participatory science communication can achieve a level of interaction between scientists and publics that goes beyond valuing participants' knowledge and experience. Thomas and Cassidy (2022) recognise the democratic potential of participatory science communication, describing it as "engaged research", quoting Holliman et al (2015): "researchers meaningfully interact with various stakeholders over any or all stages of a research process, from issue formulation through the production or co-production of new knowledge, to knowledge evaluation and dissemination" (p. 1).…”
Section: Postulating a Ladder Of "Participatory Science Communication"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meskipun Gather Town merupakan platform konferensi web, ia menyediakan lingkungan yang jauh lebih interaktif daripada Zoom, sehingga memberikan ruang yang lebih nyaman dimana para peserta dapat bersantai dan merasa seolah mereka sedang bekerja secara langsung dalam grafik seperti permainan. Selain itu, pengguna harus bijak dalam penggunaan platform antara untuk formal dan informal yang akan membantu menciptakan perbedaan antara kegiatan pembelajaran yang fokus dan aktivitas sosial yang santai meskipun dalam layar (Thomas & Cassidy, 2022). Dari beberapa penjelasan tersebut sangat memperkuat alasan peneliti untuk menggunakan platform Gather Town dalam praktik materi Rapat kelas XII OTKP.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified