2004
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/09/044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise determination of the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM

Abstract: We present the implementation of the radiative corrections of the Higgs sector in three public computer codes for the evaluation of the particle spectrum in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, SoftSusy, SPheno and SuSpect. We incorporate the full one-loop corrections to the Higgs boson masses and the electroweak symmetry breaking conditions, as well as the two-loop corrections controlled by the strong gauge coupling and the Yukawa couplings of the third generation fermions. We include also the correctio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
323
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(340 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
16
323
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At least for not too heavy Higgs bosons, this larger uncertainty reconciles the MSTW and ABKM/HERAPDF predictions. 12 Note that for M H < ∼ 200 GeV, we obtain smaller uncertainties compared to the ≈ ±15-20% uncertainty of σ NNLO (gg → H) at the Tevatron, a reflection of the better control on the behavior of the gluon density at moderate-x values (relevant for the lHC) compared to high-x values (relevant for the Tevatron).…”
Section: Jhep03(2011)055mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At least for not too heavy Higgs bosons, this larger uncertainty reconciles the MSTW and ABKM/HERAPDF predictions. 12 Note that for M H < ∼ 200 GeV, we obtain smaller uncertainties compared to the ≈ ±15-20% uncertainty of σ NNLO (gg → H) at the Tevatron, a reflection of the better control on the behavior of the gluon density at moderate-x values (relevant for the lHC) compared to high-x values (relevant for the Tevatron).…”
Section: Jhep03(2011)055mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, we will view this uncertainty as a measure of the difference between the various possible parameterizations of the PDFs and, hence, consider it as a true theoretical uncertainty with no statistical ground as will be discussed shortly. 12 Note that we could also take into account the effects due to the bottom and charm quark masses on the PDFs. Indeed, a change in the fitted masses for these quarks may affect the gluon splitting and hence alter the shape of the gluon-gluon luminosity in gg → H. We have estimated quantitatively this effect by using the m b and mc dependent MSTW PDFs [89] with mc = 1.40 ± 0.15 GeV and m b = 4.75 ± 0.05 GeV.…”
Section: Jhep03(2011)055mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While h ≃ H SM if m A is large, in general the bound on m h depends on MSSM parameters, including CP violating phases that we have ignored in our analysis. The evaluation of m h is also uncertain to about ∼ 3 GeV due to missing two-loop corrections [37]. For these reasons, we do not include any bound on m h in the LEP2-excluded blue region, but only show the boundary of the region m h ≤ 110 GeV by the magenta contour (lower-left) in the figure.…”
Section: The Msugra Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the MSSM detailed estimates for theoretical uncertainties of the Higgs-mass predictions are available, see e.g. [34,35]. Automated estimates of the theoretical uncertainties depending on the considered parameter point within the MSSM can, e.g., be performed with FeynHiggs [34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%