1962
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.9.521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Neutron and Proton Form Factors at Low Momentum Transfers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing experimental data on the root mean square (rms) proton charge radius [157,158] lead to the proton size correction about 1100 kHz for the 1S state in hydrogen and about 140 kHz for the 2S state, and is thus much larger than the experimental accuracy of the Lamb shift measurements. Unfortunately, there is a discrepancy between the results of [157,158], which influences the theoretical prediction for the Lamb shifts, and a new experiment on measuring the proton charge radius is badly needed.…”
Section: A Spin One-half Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existing experimental data on the root mean square (rms) proton charge radius [157,158] lead to the proton size correction about 1100 kHz for the 1S state in hydrogen and about 140 kHz for the 2S state, and is thus much larger than the experimental accuracy of the Lamb shift measurements. Unfortunately, there is a discrepancy between the results of [157,158], which influences the theoretical prediction for the Lamb shifts, and a new experiment on measuring the proton charge radius is badly needed.…”
Section: A Spin One-half Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a discrepancy between the results of [157,158], which influences the theoretical prediction for the Lamb shifts, and a new experiment on measuring the proton charge radius is badly needed. A new value of the proton charge radius was derived recently from the improved theoretical analysis of the low momentum transfer scattering experiments [159].…”
Section: A Spin One-half Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three paramaterizations described below are determined through a χ 2 minimization involving 269 cross section data points [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and 39 polarization data points [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. In most polarization data, and in some cross section data, the systematic uncertainties are dominant and may vary from point to point in a given experiment.…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refenes) Fl Reatio Quant nN-o Bumiller (1961) [24] Lehmann (1962) [25] Drickey (1962) [26] Dudelzak (1963) [27] Berkelman (1963) [ Borkowski (1975) [53,54] Simon (1980) [55] Bosted (1990) [56] Sill (1993) [57,58] Walker (1994) [59,60] Andivahis (1994) [61,62] Mark III…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%