2013
DOI: 10.3788/ope.20132110.2610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision analysis of indoor simulation system for laser angle deception jam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10, the anti-jamming effectiveness of the three pulse locking methods increases with the increase of the high repetition frequency interference frequency, and when f ≤ 200 kHz, the interference effectiveness increases rapidly with the high repetition frequency interference frequency f. When f > 200 kHz, the increase is slow. The analysis shows that the anti-jamming performance of the first pulse locking and the last pulse locking on the high repetition frequency interference is equivalent, and the anti-jamming performance of the optimal timing pulse locking on the high repetition frequency interference is much higher than that of the other two pulse locking methods [26] .…”
Section: High Repetition Rate Laser Interferencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…10, the anti-jamming effectiveness of the three pulse locking methods increases with the increase of the high repetition frequency interference frequency, and when f ≤ 200 kHz, the interference effectiveness increases rapidly with the high repetition frequency interference frequency f. When f > 200 kHz, the increase is slow. The analysis shows that the anti-jamming performance of the first pulse locking and the last pulse locking on the high repetition frequency interference is equivalent, and the anti-jamming performance of the optimal timing pulse locking on the high repetition frequency interference is much higher than that of the other two pulse locking methods [26] .…”
Section: High Repetition Rate Laser Interferencementioning
confidence: 97%