“…10, the anti-jamming effectiveness of the three pulse locking methods increases with the increase of the high repetition frequency interference frequency, and when f ≤ 200 kHz, the interference effectiveness increases rapidly with the high repetition frequency interference frequency f. When f > 200 kHz, the increase is slow. The analysis shows that the anti-jamming performance of the first pulse locking and the last pulse locking on the high repetition frequency interference is equivalent, and the anti-jamming performance of the optimal timing pulse locking on the high repetition frequency interference is much higher than that of the other two pulse locking methods [26] .…”