2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2002.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision and accuracy in applied 14C dating: some findings from the Fourth International Radiocarbon Inter-comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliability of the laboratory. Samples from laboratories that did not take part in the laboratory inter-comparison exercises (Scott et al, 2004) were used with caution in site-specific analyses, but included in the SPPs. Samples without laboratory number were rejected.…”
Section: Quality-checking Of 14 C-datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability of the laboratory. Samples from laboratories that did not take part in the laboratory inter-comparison exercises (Scott et al, 2004) were used with caution in site-specific analyses, but included in the SPPs. Samples without laboratory number were rejected.…”
Section: Quality-checking Of 14 C-datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeologists often appear reluctant to explain why they accept some radiocarbon dates and reject others. (Scott et al 2004). However, radiocarbon dates should always be assessed for reliability according to the above criteria.…”
Section: Radiocarbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are blind tests or intercomparisons between the laboratories which are a check for both reproducibility and systematic errors in the laboratory. 25 And finally, there is the possibility for multiple measurements. Duplicate or triplicate analysis for selected samples is a very good reproducibility test, yielding information on matters like inhomogenuity of the sample material, which are otherwise difficult to control.…”
Section: Other Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%