Precision in Immune Management: Balancing Steroid Exposure, Rejection Risk, and Infectious Outcomes in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

Abstract

Background/Objectives: With kidney transplant immunosuppression, physicians must balance preventing rejection with minimizing infection and malignancy risks. Steroids have been a mainstay of these immunosuppression regimens since the early days of kidney transplantation, yet their risks remain debated. Our study looks at the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing early steroid withdrawal (ESW) vs. steroid continuous (SCI) maintenance immunosuppression in adult kidney transplant recipients. Methods: A retrospective case-control study, utilizing propensity score-matching, was performed using the US Collaborative Network Database within TriNetX to evaluate renal transplant outcomes at one year in first-time kidney transplant adult patients (>18 years old) who were prescribed an ESW regimen (no steroids after post-transplant day 7 with maintenance tacrolimus [tac] + mycophenolic acid [MMP]/mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) vs. SCI (tac + MMF/MMP + prednisone). Cohorts were matched on demographics, comorbidities, previously described risk factors for rejection, and induction immunosuppression. Primary outcomes included viral infections, pyelonephritis, and sepsis. Secondary outcomes included renal transplant rejection, death-censored allograft failure (eGFR < 15 mL/min), patient mortality, delayed graft function, and diabetes mellitus. Results: A total of 2056 patients were in each cohort after matching (mean age: 50.7–51 years, 17.9–20.0% African American, 60–60.6% male.) The SCI cohort had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of composite viremia (18 vs. 28.1%, ESW vs. SCI, p < 0.01) driven by CMV, EBV, and BK virus. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in the SCI cohort (3.21% vs. 5.49%, ESW vs. SCI, p < 0.01). Delayed graft function was also higher in the SCI cohort (19.55% vs. 22.79%, ESW vs. SCI, p < 0.01). Pyelonephritis (2.3 vs. 4.91%, ESW vs. SCI, p < 0.01) and sepsis (2.15 vs. 5.95%, ESW vs. SCI, p < 0.01) were higher in the SCI cohort. Rejection rates were similar between ESW and SCI (29 vs. 31%, ESW vs. SCI, p = 0.41). There were significantly higher incidences of graft failure (4.9 vs. 9.9%, ESW vs. SCI, p < 0.01) and mortality (0.8 vs. 2.1%, ESW vs. SCI, p < 0.01) in the SCI cohort. Conclusions: This well-matched case-control study suggests that ESW is associated with lower infectious outcomes, mortality, and graft failure without increasing rejection risk, supporting the potential benefits of ESW in kidney transplant patients.