2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of Second-Generation High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography: Intra- and Intertester Reproducibilities and Factors Involved in the Reproducibility of Cortical Porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A–D ; Supplemental Table S6). Consistent with ranges reported in HR‐pQCT fracture studies (Supplemental Fig. S13 B ), density‐related measurements ( CV % RMS = 0.8 − 2.0%; Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A–D ; Supplemental Table S6). Consistent with ranges reported in HR‐pQCT fracture studies (Supplemental Fig. S13 B ), density‐related measurements ( CV % RMS = 0.8 − 2.0%; Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We conducted a rapid meta-analysis of short-term in vivo reproducibility of HR-pQCT measures assessed by the XCT scanner. (38,(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50) Density-related measures had the best reproducibility of 0.8-2.0%, which was comparable to DXA-derived aBMD reproducibility (CV% RMS = 0.8-2.3%). (55) The signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) of HR-pQCT and DXA can be calculated as the ratio of fracture-associated differences to LSC, thus allowing for a direct comparison of DXA and HR-pQCT performance.…”
Section: Hr-pqct Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations