2003
DOI: 10.2989/16085914.2003.9626597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation impact of juvenileGilchristella aestuaria(Clupeidae) andAtherina breviceps(Atherinidae) on the zooplankton in the temperate Kariega estuary, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, this study has provided insights into dietary interactions between adult G. aestuaria and A. breviceps and the possible drivers that influence food availability and competition between the two species. Zooplanktivorous fish trophic ecology in the Kariega Estuary is consistent with previously recorded information on these species (Coetzee, ; Bennett, ; Froneman & Vorwerk, ), thus suggesting that there is indeed potential dietary competition between these taxa. This research, which covers all four seasons and different river‐flow conditions, has also provided improved knowledge of the possible links between river flow, physico‐chemical conditions, zooplankton abundance and the distribution and abundance of dominant zooplanktivorous fish species in a warm‐temperate estuary, thus providing a baseline for similar studies elsewhere in South Africa and the rest of the world.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, this study has provided insights into dietary interactions between adult G. aestuaria and A. breviceps and the possible drivers that influence food availability and competition between the two species. Zooplanktivorous fish trophic ecology in the Kariega Estuary is consistent with previously recorded information on these species (Coetzee, ; Bennett, ; Froneman & Vorwerk, ), thus suggesting that there is indeed potential dietary competition between these taxa. This research, which covers all four seasons and different river‐flow conditions, has also provided improved knowledge of the possible links between river flow, physico‐chemical conditions, zooplankton abundance and the distribution and abundance of dominant zooplanktivorous fish species in a warm‐temperate estuary, thus providing a baseline for similar studies elsewhere in South Africa and the rest of the world.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The present study investigated the potential spatio‐temporal dietary overlap between G. aestuaria and A. breviceps and determined that the high degree of dietary overlap recorded for the middle reaches may be partially alleviated by the abundance of copepods, a preferred food source for both species in this region. Similar patterns of associative distribution between A. breviceps , G. aestuaria and their major zooplankton prey have been reported from both the Kariega and Sundays estuaries (Froneman & Vorwerk, ; Strydom et al, ). The loss however, of zooplankton prey from the middle zone (in particular) due to river flooding meant that competition could not be determined for this region due to the absence of both zooplanktivorous fish species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Many of these studies have focused specifically on the diet of individual species of larval fish (Puvanendran and Brown 1999;Parra and Yúfera 2000), prey selection (Rajasilta and Vuorinen 1983), larval fish feeding impacts on zooplankton density (Pepin and Penney 2000), and requirements for larval fish during first feeding and early growth (Dabrowski 1984;Osse et al 1997). In South Africa, a number of fish dietary studies have been undertaken (Masson and Marais 1975;Whitfield and Harrison 1996;Talbot and Baird 1985;Hecht and van der Lingen 1992;Schlacher and Wooldridge 1996;Froneman and Vorwerk 2003). However, very few studies have focused on larval fish diet or prey selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be a result of observed low stomach fullness (not quantified in our study), which was probably because the time of sampling (during the night) was not coincident with the time of peak feeding of G. aestuaria, which is in the afternoon (Blaber 1979;Froneman and Vorwerk 2003). Although Olivar et al (2009) maintained that the removal of the viscera from larvae might have an important effect on the individual RNA/DNA ratio because of the relatively high RNA concentration in the liver, Mustafa and Mittal (1982) showed that the quantity of RNA in the liver, unlike in other tissues such as the brain, exhibited high fluctuations following changes in food availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the Sundays Estuary, the copepod Pseudodiaptomus hessei provides more than 50% of the food for larvae and juveniles of G. aestuaria (Blaber 1979;Whitfield and Harrison 1996;Sutherland et al 2013). In the Kariega system, however, individuals between 18 and 25 mm SL have been shown to have a more diverse diet (Froneman and Vorwerk 2003). In addition, G. aestuaria has been described as an opportunistic feeder, depending on prey availability (Blaber 1979;Coetzee 1982;Bennett 1989;Cyrus et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%