Predicting blood donation behaviour: further application of the theory of planned behaviour

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test whether, in the context of blood donation, the predictive ability of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) extends from behavioural intention to actual donation behaviour, and whether extended versions of the TPB perform better than the standard version.Design/methodology/approachIntentions to donate blood predicted by the TPB are compared with an accurate measure of blood donation behaviour obtained following a mobile blood drive by the New Zealand Blood Service.FindingsWhen the observed outcome is donation behaviour rather than behavioural intention, the TPB model's performance drops. Extending the variables in the model to include moral obligation and past behaviour does not improve its predictive ability, and neither does the use of belief‐based variables.Practical implicationsThe TPB is much less effective in predicting blood donation behaviour than it is in predicting intentions to donate blood. But only actual donation behaviour yields medical supplies. This study suggests that to advance the goal of increasing donation rates, attention needs to turn to methods other than the TPB to identify variables that do predict donation behaviour.Originality/valueThe present study gathered one of the largest samples used for TPB blood donation research; this enabled predictions made using the TPB to be tested against actual behaviour, rather than behavioural intention, the measure typically used in blood donation studies. Because blood donation is a low‐incidence behaviour, previous studies have been hampered by small sample sizes, that inevitably contain few donors, and no measure of actual donation behaviour.

Self‐efficacy or perceived behavioural control: Which influences consumers' physical activity and healthful eating behaviour maintenance?

“…Although participation in behaviours takes many forms and involves varying levels of intensity over time, behaviours are generally studied from a static perspective and often only intentions are studied rather than actual behavioural performance (Courneya & Bobick, ; Hansen et al, ). Given the gap between intentions and behaviours (Holdershaw et al, ) and that behaviour can be habituated, the omission of actual behaviour in health behaviour evaluations limits our understanding inflating the effect size for psychological constructs due to the absence of prior behaviours. Furthermore, consideration of behaviour change requires a temporal element to determine which factors are impacting behaviour over time.Hypothesis Intentions will positively influence physical activity behaviour.Hypothesis Intentions will positively influence healthful eating behaviour.…”

Can the theory of planned behaviour explain walking to and from school among Australian children? A social marketing formative research study

“…Other authors also posit that the TPB does not address how people translate their intention into behaviour and therefore is unable to solve intention–behaviour discrepancies (Schwarzer, ). Holdershaw, Gendall, and Wright (), for example, found that intentions failed to align with behaviours when they used the TPB to explain blood donation behaviours. However, in the context of behaviour change interventions targeting physical activity, a meta‐analytic review by Hagger, Chatzisarantis, and Biddle () showed that the TPB exhibited a good fit for physical activity intentions and behaviour.…”

African culturally and linguistically diverse communities’ blood donation intentions in Australia: integrating knowledge into the theory of planned behavior

“…The TPB is one of the most common models used to examine blood donation and a variety of alternative TPB models have been used in various countries, including Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, as well as Australia . Consequently, a range of variables and relationships that should be included within the broader TPB model have been proposed.…”