2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine &Amp; Biology Society (EMBC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Cancer Types From miRNA Stem-loops Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications of DL to assist physicians and scientists in clinical settings using epigenomic data have been relatively unexplored until very recently. Except for one paper published in 2016, 21 out of 22 papers reviewed were published in the last 5 years and a majority of the models were developed by USA and China research teams [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. This suggests a novel field of study that gains an increasing interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Applications of DL to assist physicians and scientists in clinical settings using epigenomic data have been relatively unexplored until very recently. Except for one paper published in 2016, 21 out of 22 papers reviewed were published in the last 5 years and a majority of the models were developed by USA and China research teams [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. This suggests a novel field of study that gains an increasing interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various network architectures were employed such as multi-layer perceptron, autoencoder and its variants, convolutional neural network, and deep belief network. Reviewed models yielded high accuracy ranged from 88.3% to 100.0% for disease detection tasks [ 23 , 24 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], from 69.5% to 97.8% for subtype classification tasks [ 32 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 ], and from 80.0% to 93.0% for treatment response prediction tasks [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations