2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04286-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the impact and publication date of individual scientists’ future papers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some quantitative approaches were also initialized by the discussion of the relations between self-citation, citation and related influence factors ( Yu and Wang, 2007 ; Galiani and Gálvez, 2019 ; Brzica, 2021 ; Huang et al., 2021 ; Zhou, 2021 ). In addition, studies were recently promoted for quantitatively predicting the citation of article ( Abrishami and Aliakbary, 2019 ; Huang et al., 2022 ; Zhao and Feng, 2022 ; Zhou et al., 2022 ), author ( Ayaz et al., 2018 ), journal ( Rocha-e-Silva, 2016 ), etc. These quantitative approaches may be essential to establish a robust quantitative model for the citation behaviors of articles and to provide clues and suggestions for the improvement of the present JIF-based evaluation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some quantitative approaches were also initialized by the discussion of the relations between self-citation, citation and related influence factors ( Yu and Wang, 2007 ; Galiani and Gálvez, 2019 ; Brzica, 2021 ; Huang et al., 2021 ; Zhou, 2021 ). In addition, studies were recently promoted for quantitatively predicting the citation of article ( Abrishami and Aliakbary, 2019 ; Huang et al., 2022 ; Zhao and Feng, 2022 ; Zhou et al., 2022 ), author ( Ayaz et al., 2018 ), journal ( Rocha-e-Silva, 2016 ), etc. These quantitative approaches may be essential to establish a robust quantitative model for the citation behaviors of articles and to provide clues and suggestions for the improvement of the present JIF-based evaluation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%