Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates under tri-axial loading

Bogetti, Travis A.; Staniszewski, Jeffrey M.; Burns, Bruce P.; Hoppel, Christopher P.; Gillespie, John W.; Tierney, John

doi:10.1177/0021998312449889

Cited by 21 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(a) Bogetti, Staniszewski, Burns, Hoppel, Gillespie and Tierney 13 Bogetti (b) Carrere, Laurin and Maire 10 Carrere (c) Huang, Jin, Ha and Tsai 15 Tsai-Ha (d) Nelson, Hansen and Mayes 6 Hansen (e) Zhou and Huang 12 Huang (f) Pinho, Darvizeh, Robinson, Schuecker and Camanho 9 Pinho (g) Zand, Wolfe, Butalia and Schoeppner 11…”

Section: Identification Of the Theoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarking of triaxial failure criteria for composite laminates: Comparison between models of ‘Part (A)’ of ‘WWFE-II’

Kaddour

Hinton

2012

Journal of Composite Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a part of the Second World-Wide Failure Exercise, the originators (or their collaborators) of three-dimensional failure theories applied their methods to 12 carefully selected challenging problems (test cases). In this article, the 'blind' theoretical predictions from 12 failure theories, making the backbone of Part (A) of the Second World-Wide Failure Exercise, are compiled in a structured manner. Key features in each theory are identified including: types of failure models employed, whether linear or nonlinear analysis was carried out, reliance on software and numerical methods, allowance for thermal stresses and identification of modes of failure. The results (failure envelopes and stress-strain curves) have been superimposed to show similarities and differences between the predictions of the various theories. In addition, bar charts have been constructed to demonstrate the levels of agreement between the predicted failure stresses and strains. Sources of differences between the predictions of the various three-dimensional failure theories are discussed. Further publications are planned in Part B in which comparison will be made between the predictions described here and the experimental results.

show abstract

Section: Identification Of the Theoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarking of triaxial failure criteria for composite laminates: Comparison between models of ‘Part (A)’ of ‘WWFE-II’

Kaddour

Hinton

2012

Journal of Composite Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For three-dimensional failure criterion, several solutions based on meso-mechanics [4,5,6] and macro-mechanics [7,8,9,10] were proposed in The Second World-Wide Failure Exercise (WWFE-II).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined modelling and experimental studies of failure in thick laminates under out-of-plane shear

Jia

Zhang

et al. 2016

Composites Part B: Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Details of 12 models used and their predictions are published in various associated references. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] A comparison between all of these predictions is made in Kaddour and Hinton. 15 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Input data for test cases used in benchmarking triaxial failure theories of composites

Kaddour

Hinton

2012

Journal of Composite Materials

178

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article gives details of the input data provided for use in the Second World-Wide Failure Exercise (WWFE-II) for benchmarking triaxial failure criteria. It includes (a) three-dimensional elastic constants, ultimate strains and strengths and the nonlinear stress-strain curves for five unidirectional laminae and their constituents and (b) a description of 12 challenging test cases of 5 composite laminates, the lay-ups, layer thicknesses, stacking sequences and the loading conditions. The originators of 3D failure theories were requested to use the exact data provided here in their blind predictions of the test cases. The instructions issued to the contributors are also presented at the end of this article.

show abstract

Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates under tri-axial loading

Cited by 21 publications

References 32 publications

Benchmarking of triaxial failure criteria for composite laminates: Comparison between models of ‘Part (A)’ of ‘WWFE-II’

Benchmarking of triaxial failure criteria for composite laminates: Comparison between models of ‘Part (A)’ of ‘WWFE-II’

Combined modelling and experimental studies of failure in thick laminates under out-of-plane shear

Input data for test cases used in benchmarking triaxial failure theories of composites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About