2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Which Older Adults Will or Will Not Fall Using the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
108
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
108
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the current study supported the hypothesis that the TSTWT EO demonstrated concurrent validity as a test of dynamic walking balance in a cross-sectional, healthy population. The walk on floor eyes closed (WOFEC) version of the TWT had been validated, validity coefficient of .83, as a discriminatory test of walking dynamic balance in its ability to identify participants with labyrinthine defective ataxia [29], as a component of balance test batteries primarily utilized for elderly populations for the purpose of fall prediction [3][4][5][6][7], but had not been validated as an individualized measure of walking dynamic balance in a healthy population within the age range of 20 and 75 years. The TSTWT EO demonstrated moderate to high positive [53] correlation values with commonly used laboratory measures of dynamic balance (BBS DLOS, gait COP, time, and spatial measures, and the mFRQ) in a healthy population between the ages of 20-75 years, with increased strength of association demonstrated when values were adjusted for participant age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results from the current study supported the hypothesis that the TSTWT EO demonstrated concurrent validity as a test of dynamic walking balance in a cross-sectional, healthy population. The walk on floor eyes closed (WOFEC) version of the TWT had been validated, validity coefficient of .83, as a discriminatory test of walking dynamic balance in its ability to identify participants with labyrinthine defective ataxia [29], as a component of balance test batteries primarily utilized for elderly populations for the purpose of fall prediction [3][4][5][6][7], but had not been validated as an individualized measure of walking dynamic balance in a healthy population within the age range of 20 and 75 years. The TSTWT EO demonstrated moderate to high positive [53] correlation values with commonly used laboratory measures of dynamic balance (BBS DLOS, gait COP, time, and spatial measures, and the mFRQ) in a healthy population between the ages of 20-75 years, with increased strength of association demonstrated when values were adjusted for participant age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TWT test has been utilized as the dynamic walking balance component of several validated test batteries regarding fall prediction in the elderly, such as the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale [3,4], the LIFE pilot study protocol [5], Good Walkers Test [6], and the EPIDOS Prospective Study balance protocol [7]. The TWT has been utilized as a test of dynamic walking balance to determine gait stability and pathological quantification including prediction of falls in the elderly population [3,9,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40], diagnose ataxia and other vestibular disorders [29,41], test for vertigo [42], tropical ataxic neuropathy [43], traumatic brain injury [40], peripheral neuropathy [44], and functional mobility [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Cronbach's alpha value of 0.81 was established for the total FAB scale score, confirming its good internal consistency (Klein et al, 2010). This is a performance-based measure that comprehensively addresses the multiple dimensions of balance, through static and dynamic balance activities performed in different sensory environments, and is considered to be useful for screening and identifying subtle changes in balance abilities, that act as precursor to an increased probability of falling (Hernandez and Rose, 2008). This balance assessment can be conducted in a relatively small area and its administration requires approximately 10-12 min.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Performance on each of the individual test items is scored using a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4), with a maximum score of 40 points possible, representing an optimal balance performance. Lower scores mean lower balance performance and higher probability for falling (Hernandez and Rose, 2008;Rose et al, 2006).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%