2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(99)00955-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of kidney nonfunction after transplantation with machine perfusion preservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, nine [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] were published between 1974 and 1981, reporting seven studies of the use of perfusate flow characteristics and biochemical markers. A further 17 papers published since 1993 have been identified, [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] reporting 11 studies. Details of all studies are given in Table 4.…”
Section: Papers Identified For Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, nine [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] were published between 1974 and 1981, reporting seven studies of the use of perfusate flow characteristics and biochemical markers. A further 17 papers published since 1993 have been identified, [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] reporting 11 studies. Details of all studies are given in Table 4.…”
Section: Papers Identified For Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, given the clear need to reduce unnecessary organ refusals, a more forwardthinking hypothesis is that biomarkers like perfusate pi-GST might differentiate between recoverable versus unrecoverable kidney injury more precisely than current perfusion parameters. Many OPOs and prospective transplant centers pay close attention to perfusion parameters at the time of organ offer (12,(15)(16)(17). Consequently, most observational studies that assess the utility of perfusion parameters in predicting allograft outcomes are limited by potential selection bias and confounding by indication, and the current study is no different in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We assessed the effect of perfusion duration on the association between post pi-GST and DGF via stratified analysis with three duration categories (<8, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], and >16 hours). The RR estimate for DGF with each unit increase in Log e (post pi-GST) were comparable for each category in the range of 1.3 to 1.6.…”
Section: Associations Of Perfusate Gst Pump Parameters and The Outcomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuestro grupo de trabajo tiene grandes expectativas en la conservaci贸n mediante perfusi贸n, pues son varias las experiencias que refieren mejores resultados con este tipo de preservaci贸n 13,44 . Adem谩s, es en los 贸rga-nos procedentes de donantes en parada cardiaca, en los que la posibilidad de evaluarlos para analizar su viabilidad resulta una herramienta muy 煤til a la hora de discriminar entre 贸rganos de caracter铆sticas potencialmente sub贸ptimas 45 . Durante a帽os el 煤nico criterio v谩lido para demostrar la viabilidad de un ri帽贸n que ha sido trasplantado era el propio trasplante.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified