2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive factors associated with complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of these factors could hopefully help clinicians to identify potential candidates for a watch and wait management. 22 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of these factors could hopefully help clinicians to identify potential candidates for a watch and wait management. 22 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients may achieve pathological complete response (pCR), which is defined as the complete absence of tumor cells in the resected specimen, while some patients may only have partial response or no response. The reported pCR rate of LACR to nCRT is relatively low, ranging from 10% to 30% ( 1 4 ). Patients who achieve a pCR may adopt a conservative “watch and wait” strategy without surgery ( 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A successful watch-and-wait approach relies on a high correlation between cCR and pCR. In the pre-TNT era, the identification of the predictors of pCR after neoadjuvant therapy had been well studied and predictors included tumor size, circumferential extent, the pre-therapeutic T and N clinical stage, tumor fixation, and the distance of the tumor from the anal margin [25][26][27][28][29]. The last meta-analysis to assess the summative evidence on this important treatment decision point predates the acceptance and dissemination of TNT strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%