2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2012.6232217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive maneuver evaluation for enhancement of Car-to-X mobility data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trajectory prediction has been researched extensively. Approaches include the Bayesian formulation [27], the Monte Carlo simulation [10], Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) [14], and Kalman Filters [23].…”
Section: Prediction Algorithms and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trajectory prediction has been researched extensively. Approaches include the Bayesian formulation [27], the Monte Carlo simulation [10], Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) [14], and Kalman Filters [23].…”
Section: Prediction Algorithms and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the speed reported by the positioning sensors should be consistent with the vehicle velocity obtained from the speedometer. Plausibilityand consistency-based solutions [10,29,50,51,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66] can effectively detect many types of attacks under controlled conditions, in which accurate and reliable information can be collected. However, the vehicular environment is highly dynamic, and the collection of accurate and reliable information cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches reported in literature include Bayesian networks [8], Monte Carlo Simulation [9], Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [10], [11], [12], Support Vector Machines [13] and prototype based methods [14].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual observations are not independent given H i , so a naive Bayesian approach would not model the underlying probability distribution correctly. Instead, we chose to average the individual scores from (12) to obtain…”
Section: B Comparison-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%