2020
DOI: 10.34172/aim.2020.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Identifying Critical Patients with Malignancy in Emergency Department

Abstract: Background: Identification of critically ill patient is particularly important in the emergency department (ED). The prolonged duration from hospital admission to delivering intensive care service is related to increased mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for identifying critical patients with malignancy in ED settings. Methods: We evaluated patients with malignancy who were admitted to our ED of a tertiary university hospital in Turkey over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of the 33 included studies is presented in Supplementary Table 1 . All studies were observational in nature, with 17 prospective studies [ 32 48 ] and 16 retrospective studies [ 19 , 20 , 49 62 ]. Thirty-two studies were single site studies [ 19 , 20 , 32 41 , 43 62 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A summary of the 33 included studies is presented in Supplementary Table 1 . All studies were observational in nature, with 17 prospective studies [ 32 48 ] and 16 retrospective studies [ 19 , 20 , 49 62 ]. Thirty-two studies were single site studies [ 19 , 20 , 32 41 , 43 62 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-two studies were single site studies [ 19 , 20 , 32 41 , 43 62 ]. The countries of origin were Turkey ( n = 8) [ 33 , 34 , 37 39 , 42 , 45 , 48 ], United States ( n = 3) [ 41 , 43 , 49 ], United Kingdom ( n = 3) [ 44 , 50 , 51 ], Australia ( n = 3) [ 19 , 20 , 57 ], China ( n = 3) [ 35 , 60 , 62 ], Italy ( n = 2) [ 58 , 61 ], Indonesia ( n = 2) [ 46 , 47 ] and one study each from Finland [ 32 ], Demark [ 54 ], Norway [ 36 ], Netherlands [ 40 ]. Switzerland [ 55 ], Brazil [ 52 ], Singapore [ 53 ], Taiwan [ 59 ], and Korea [ 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations