2006
DOI: 10.1097/01263942-200606000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Injury Associated with Rape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(236 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study had lack of control over the examination and little detail on injury classification procedures and therefore was not included in this review (Crane, 2006).…”
Section: Injury Prevalence With Visual Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study had lack of control over the examination and little detail on injury classification procedures and therefore was not included in this review (Crane, 2006).…”
Section: Injury Prevalence With Visual Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Several retrospective case review studies, with sample sizes that ranged from 153 to 3356 subjects, identified increased injury frequency in persons younger than 20 years or older than 40 years. 14,15,20,21 One study found that adolescents were more likely to have multiple injuries than were young adults. 16 Importantly, no association between age and injury was noted in either of the two case-control studies specifically designed to examine this relationship.…”
Section: Injuries and Nonconsensual Intercoursementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This interval was defined as more than 48 hours in one study 15 and more than 72 hours in another study. 21 In 2 studies, both a history of multiple pregnancies and acquaintance with one's reported assailant correlated with a lower incidence of genital injury. 15,20 …”
Section: Injuries and Nonconsensual Intercoursementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies either make reference to evaluations by different examiners or call for a reliability test in the future, but lack specific information on how these tests should be conducted and designed (Crane, 2006; Drocton, Sachs, Chu, & Wheeler, 2008; Sachs & Chu, 2002), Eckert, Sugar, & Fine, 2004; Sommers, 2006; Anderson, Mc Clain, & Riviello, 2006; Adams & Knudsen, 1996; Jones, Rossman, Hartman, & Alexander, 2003; Jones, Rossman, Wynn, Dunnuk & Schwartz, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%