Prefabricated Construction Risks: A Holistic Exploration through Advanced Bibliometric Tool and Content Analysis

Abstract

Prefabricated construction (PC) offers advantages to the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry such as quality production, fast project completion, low waste output, high environmental sensitivity, and high security. Although PC has several advantages, knowledge gaps persist, necessitating a comprehensive bibliometric study. This research adopts a holistic bibliometric approach, combining qualitative (systematic literature review) and quantitative (bibliometric analysis) methods to assess the current state of prefabricated construction risks (PCRs) research and identify the literature trends. Unlike previous PCRs studies, our research capitalizes on the quantitative analysis capabilities of the Bibliometrix R-tool. We introduce innovative measures, such as the h-index, thematic mapping, and trend topic analysis, to deepen the understanding of the PCRs research landscape. Moreover, this study explores the intellectual structure of PCR research through keyword analysis, cluster analysis, and thematic evaluation, providing valuable insights into scientific studies, collaborations, and knowledge dissemination. In our study, following a systematic literature review to understand the existing knowledge, the R-studio Bibliometrix package is used to map the field, identify gaps in the field, and analyze the trends. This study involves a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 150 articles in the field of PCRs, with data obtained from the Web of Science spanning from 2000 to 2023. The findings from the analyses reveal that the studies were divided into four different clusters: management, programming, logistics, and supply chain. Additionally, themes such as the integration of PC with Building Information Management (BIM), barriers, and stakeholders were also explored. The analyses indicate a growing awareness of PCRs, particularly in specific areas such as management, performance, and supply chain. This study stands out for its unique methods, analytical approach, and the use of specialized software. It provides valuable insights and suggestions for future studies.

Mapping the Landscape of Misinformation Detection: A Bibliometric Approach

“…From a methodological point of view, the bibliometric analysis comprises mainly two parts: one related to the dataset extraction, and another one dedicated to performing the bibliometric analysis [29,30]. The two parts are described in the following sub-sections.…”

Guiding Urban Decision-Making: A Study on Recommender Systems in Smart Cities

“…Figure 1 acts as the initial foundation for the indicated discussion, highlighting two primary phases, dataset extraction and bibliometric analysis. This methodological approach is similar to the one suggested in the scientific literature for conducting a bibliometric analysis [20,21]. The first part refers to the stages followed by the authors in order to generate the relevant dataset for the present analysis.…”

Tracking Happiness in Times of COVID-19: A Bibliometric Exploration

“…This analysis is a different approach to systematic literature reviews, which typically employ qualitative techniques and may be susceptible to interpretation bias from scholars with diverse academic backgrounds [54]. Donthu et al [54] used a four-step methodology for the bibliometric analysis procedure, defining the aims and scope of the bibliometric study, choosing the techniques for bibliometric analysis, collecting the data, running the bibliometric analysis, and reporting the findings, while Marin-Rodriguez et al [55] and Anac et al [56] focused mainly on the steps related to data collection, bibliometric analysis, and reporting. As a result, in the following section, we will develop the steps related to dataset extraction and data analysis.…”