Preliminary experience with a large scale vascular registry

Karmody, Allastair M.; Blumenberg, Robert M.; Wall, Conrad

doi:10.1016/0002-9610(83)90364-1

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Cleveland Vascular Society, The Eastern Vascular Society, The Kentucky Vascular Society, and The South Carolina Vascular Surgical Society all formed database registries for member participation. [22][23][24][25] After initial enthusiasm, these were abandoned because of incomplete participation and missing information from data forms. Among reasons cited for failure was lack of perception of benefit by members and difficulty completing complex data forms.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A regional registry for quality assurance and improvement: The Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE)

Cronenwett

Likosky

Russell

et al. 2007

Journal of Vascular Surgery

212

202

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A regional registry for quality assurance and improvement: The Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE)

Cronenwett

Likosky

Russell

et al. 2007

Journal of Vascular Surgery

212

202

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The decision on whether a complication, such as wound infection or stroke, is eligible for inclusion is left to the surgeon's discretion. 392,395 Data collection is conducted by surgeons who complete a form at 30 days and 1 year postoperatively. These reviews are prompted by monthly lists from the register.…”

Section: The Swedish Vascular Registrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The parameter κ measures the chance-corrected proportional agreement. 395 It can take values up to 1 (perfect agreement), with a value of 0 indicating no agreement better than chance and a negative value indicating that agreement is worse than chance. The interpretation of κ follows the guidelines given in Table 21.…”

Section: Assessment Of Inter-and Intrareliability: Statistical Measurmentioning

confidence: 99%

The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events

Bruce

Russell

Mollison

et al. 2001

Health Technol Assess

299

209

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. Contact Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK.We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTAThe measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events NHS R&D HTA ProgrammeT he NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme was set up in 1993 to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.Initially, six HTA panels (pharmaceuticals, acute sector, primary and community care, diagnostics and imaging, population screening, methodology) helped to set the research priorities for the HTA Programme. However, during the past few years there have been a number of changes in and around NHS R&D, such as the establishment of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the creation of three new research programmes: Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO); New and Emerging Applications of Technology (NEAT); and the Methodology Programme.Although the National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment (NCCHTA) commissions research on behalf of the Methodology Programme, it is the Methodology Group that now considers and advises the Methodology Programme Director on the best research projects to pursue.The research reported in this monograph was funded as project number 97/16/04.The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Methodology Programme, HTA Programme or the Department of Health. The editors wish to emphasise that funding and publication of this research by the NHS should not be taken as implicit supp...

show abstract

“…The early North American publications on vascular registries in the late 1970s were a stimulus and provided the first prompting to organize vascular registries in Europe [1][2][3][4].…”

Section: The Development Of Vascular Registriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It can take long and heated discussions to agree on a minimal data set, focused on the individual vascular procedure not on the individual patient [5]. Many useful suggestions are found in Karmody's original paper [3].…”

Section: The Development Of Vascular Registriesmentioning

confidence: 99%