2007
DOI: 10.1177/0266666907084761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Insights into M-commerce Adoption in Ghana

Abstract: Utilizing case studies of farmers and fishermen in Ghana, we investigated the mobile commerce (m-commerce) idiosyncrasies of two rural businesses. We specifically examined the investment cost associated with m-commerce, and the m-commerce adoption practices of farmers and fishermen in selected rural districts in Ghana. We adopted a qualitative research approach and conducted in-depth interviews with management and operational personnel, in our target respondent firms. We found that m-commerce facilitates cost … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the overall findings here also conform to the proposition of the theory of ICTD that the use of ICT devices, such as mobile phones, for agricultural activities, has the potential to facilitate rural development, poverty reduction and sustainable agricultural development (Duncombe and Heeks, 2008). The findings here also align with the findings from the studies by Boadi, Boateng, Hinson and Opoku (2007), Ofosu-Asare (2011) and Salia, Nsowah-Nuamah and Steel (2011), that farmers benefitted from mobile phone use by getting better market information through which they were able to make informed decisions, enjoy reduction in transportation cost, have enhanced marketing activities and get increased income. Figure 3 shows that among the challenges farmers face using the mobile phones for agribusiness, epileptic power supply ranks highest with 29% followed by poor network signal (23%) and unfamiliarity with the phones' features (16%).…”
Section: Figure 2: Benefits Of Farmers' Use Of Mobile Phones On Agribsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, the overall findings here also conform to the proposition of the theory of ICTD that the use of ICT devices, such as mobile phones, for agricultural activities, has the potential to facilitate rural development, poverty reduction and sustainable agricultural development (Duncombe and Heeks, 2008). The findings here also align with the findings from the studies by Boadi, Boateng, Hinson and Opoku (2007), Ofosu-Asare (2011) and Salia, Nsowah-Nuamah and Steel (2011), that farmers benefitted from mobile phone use by getting better market information through which they were able to make informed decisions, enjoy reduction in transportation cost, have enhanced marketing activities and get increased income. Figure 3 shows that among the challenges farmers face using the mobile phones for agribusiness, epileptic power supply ranks highest with 29% followed by poor network signal (23%) and unfamiliarity with the phones' features (16%).…”
Section: Figure 2: Benefits Of Farmers' Use Of Mobile Phones On Agribsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Several meanings of m-commerce have been advanced by various researchers (see Boadi et al, 2007;Charles et al, 2007). These definitions consider m-commerce as being either only one of these conceptualizations-an innovation, an item or a service-or as a mix of the three.…”
Section: The Concept Of M-commercementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These components of M-commerce produce included esteem and advantages. Boadi et al (2007) examined the additional esteem and advantages of M-commerce as containing cost investment funds (and enhancing operational proficiency), convenience (in work and productivity) and correspondence (enhancing information quality and relationships).…”
Section: The Concept Of M-commercementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Costs refers to the cost savings and operational efficiency which a customer or firm may accrue as a result of adoption of technology (Boardi et al, 2007). Transaction costs are the costs related to using the system for example costs associated to sending and receiving money (Boateng, 2011).…”
Section: Reduced Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%