1984
DOI: 10.1021/ic00194a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and crystal structure of mercury hexafluoroniobate (Hg3NbF6) and mercury hexafluorotantalate (Hg3TaF6): mercury layer compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Exceeding of the solubility product during decrease of temperature leads to the crystallization of the complex salts -(Hg ) (PO ) , (Hg ) (PO ) , and (Hg ) (HgO )(PO ) (Eq. [7]). The existence of elemental mercury obtained in small amounts during some experiments could also be explained (Eq.…”
Section: Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exceeding of the solubility product during decrease of temperature leads to the crystallization of the complex salts -(Hg ) (PO ) , (Hg ) (PO ) , and (Hg ) (HgO )(PO ) (Eq. [7]). The existence of elemental mercury obtained in small amounts during some experiments could also be explained (Eq.…”
Section: Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cluster compounds could be subdivided into linear arrangements of mercury atoms with n"3 (2}4), n"4 (4, 5), and n"R (6), systems with a layer arrangement (7), and systems with a triangular con"guration of mercury atoms. For the latter the cluster composition is Hg> .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond valence sums (BVS) [11] of Se(1,2) are 3.98, 3.96 respectively. The barium atom in each of the two structures is coordinated by both 'vanadate' and selenate oxygen atoms, with, in the present case, a water molecule, despite the diminution in coordination number from ten to nine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] (9) 113.59 (12) 164.17 (10) 65.03 (9) 107.11 (9) 87.49 (10) 88.53(9) O(4) 3.090 (3) 104.68 (8) 149.21 (11) 126.00 (9) 78.54 (9) 78.52 (9) 52.27(9) 120.12(9) O (8) 3.046 (3) 73.22 (12) 123. 10(9) 78.76 (9) 130.72 (9) 116.82 (9) 52.02 (9) Transformations of the asymmetric unit: (i) 1 À x, 2 À y, 1 À z; (ii) 1 À x, 1 À y, 1 À z; (iii) x, 1 þ y, z; (iv) x, y À 1 2 , 3 2 À z; (v) 1 À x, y À 1 2 , 3 2 À z; (vi) x, 1 2 þ y, 3 2 À z; (vii) 1 À x, 1 2 þ y, 3 2 À z; (viii) x, y À 1, z; (ix) x, y, z.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Brown & Wu, 1976;Locock & Burns, 2004) or s ij (e.g. Brown et al, 1984) values, or by using linear least-squares fitting (of r 0 and b) against the expected ln(s ij ) values (e.g. Brown, 2009a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%