2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-013-1114-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of macroporous carbon foams using a polyurethane foam template replica method without curing step

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compressive strength values are significantly higher as compared to those of other carbon foams (e.g. Commercial ''Ultramet'' carbon foam (0.16-0.76 MPa) and commercial ''ERG'' carbon foam (0.10-0.52 MPa)) reported in the literature [50][51][52]. The compressive strength of erythritol impregnated graphite composite foam exhibited 5 times higher than that of graphite foam.…”
Section: Chemical Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The compressive strength values are significantly higher as compared to those of other carbon foams (e.g. Commercial ''Ultramet'' carbon foam (0.16-0.76 MPa) and commercial ''ERG'' carbon foam (0.10-0.52 MPa)) reported in the literature [50][51][52]. The compressive strength of erythritol impregnated graphite composite foam exhibited 5 times higher than that of graphite foam.…”
Section: Chemical Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Ceramic foams have been prepared using several methods such as direct foaming [2][3][4][5][6][7], sacrificial template or fugitives [8][9][10][11][12], replica methods [1,[13][14][15][16] and partial sintering [17,18]. Ceramic foam derived using the abovementioned methods is chemo-thermo-mechanically suitable for further processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to produce carbonaceous foams/sponges in a large scale because of their relatively high‐cost and harsh processing conditions (high‐temperature carbonization: ≈800–1000 °C)] . Furthermore, because of the high resistance of carbon‐based materials, for example, 0.34 S cm −1 carbonized polyurethane foam (0.34 S cm −1 ), reduced graphene oxide coated on polyurethane foam (0.0009–0.0025 S cm −1 ), and carbon nanotube coated on polyurethane (1 S cm −1 ), these supercapacitor sponges face issues in high internal resistance . Their performance in terms of electrical conductivity remains inferior to that of metal foams, which results in a reduced power density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%