2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation, optimization and in vitro characterization of stearoyl-gemcitabine polymeric micelles: A comparison with its self-assembled nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…194 In another approach, gemcitabine nanoparticles were prepared by loading GemC18, a stearic acid amide derivative of gemcitabine, in PEG-poly(d,l-lactic) acid (PEG-PLA) polymeric micelles or by GemC18 self-assembling. 195 Both of the nanomedicines effectively reduced the viability of gemcitabine-resistant AsPC-1 cells in culture (IC 50 values, 58.88 and 46.34 µM, respectively), whereas the molar equivalent free gemcitabine did not show any significant cytotoxicity to AsPC-1 cells. The GemC18 self-assembled nanoparticles showed greater in vitro cellular uptake and cytotoxicity than the GemC18-PEG-PLA polymeric micellar nanoparticles (ie, drug uptake in Panc-1 cells, 37.55%±2.21% for GemC18 self-assembled nanoparticles, 28.60%±1.85% for GemC18-PEG-PLA polymeric micelles, and 30.11%±1.98% for GemC18 in solution).…”
Section: Polymeric Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…194 In another approach, gemcitabine nanoparticles were prepared by loading GemC18, a stearic acid amide derivative of gemcitabine, in PEG-poly(d,l-lactic) acid (PEG-PLA) polymeric micelles or by GemC18 self-assembling. 195 Both of the nanomedicines effectively reduced the viability of gemcitabine-resistant AsPC-1 cells in culture (IC 50 values, 58.88 and 46.34 µM, respectively), whereas the molar equivalent free gemcitabine did not show any significant cytotoxicity to AsPC-1 cells. The GemC18 self-assembled nanoparticles showed greater in vitro cellular uptake and cytotoxicity than the GemC18-PEG-PLA polymeric micellar nanoparticles (ie, drug uptake in Panc-1 cells, 37.55%±2.21% for GemC18 self-assembled nanoparticles, 28.60%±1.85% for GemC18-PEG-PLA polymeric micelles, and 30.11%±1.98% for GemC18 in solution).…”
Section: Polymeric Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The GemC18 self-assembled nanoparticles showed greater in vitro cellular uptake and cytotoxicity than the GemC18-PEG-PLA polymeric micellar nanoparticles (ie, drug uptake in Panc-1 cells, 37.55%±2.21% for GemC18 self-assembled nanoparticles, 28.60%±1.85% for GemC18-PEG-PLA polymeric micelles, and 30.11%±1.98% for GemC18 in solution). 195 Gemcitabine nanoparticles were also prepared based on a gemcitabine-squalene conjugate (SQ-dFdC or SQ-Gem), which displayed a stronger antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity than gemcitabine. After orthotopic Panc-1 tumor-bearing mice were treated two times at a 4-day interval with either gemcitabine (20 mg/kg) or SQ-Gem (20 mg/kg), SQ-Gem was more effective than gemcitabine in inhibiting the tumor growth.…”
Section: Polymeric Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 In brief, 100 μL of pyrene solution (0.1 mg/mL in benzene) was aliquoted into a series of 10 mL test tubes, and the solvent benzene was evaporated under nitrogen stream at room temperature for 5 hours. A series of aqueous polymeric solutions (concentrations ranging from 10 ng/mL to 1 mg/mL) were added separately to obtain the final concentration of pyrene of 1 μg/mL, and then were sonicated for 20 minutes at room temperature, and finally were incubated at 45°C for 4 hours.…”
Section: Cells and Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next step, the morphology, release behavior and cytotoxicity of the selected formulations were investigated. Human pancreas cancer AsPC-1 cells were chosen as the model for cancer cells because they were demonstrated to be highly resistant to gemcitabine (17). The in vivo antitumor activity in balb/c mice bearing AsPC-1 cancer xenogafts was also evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%