2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4692-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prepared for PrEP: preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among Chinese men who have sex with men in an online national survey

Abstract: BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is not widely available in China. Previous studies reported low awareness and inconclusive findings on the acceptability of PrEP among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM).MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of an online national survey comparing preferences for oral and long-acting injectable PrEP among MSM and identifying correlates of preferences. The study did not collect detailed information about partner types that may influence negotiated safety and PrEP… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this cohort that studied oral PrEP preference, uptake, adherence and continuation, nearly half of AGYW preferred oral PrEP to other biomedical prevention methods, but uptake, adherence and PrEP continuation were low. Studies among men who have sex with men (MSM) show that 25–36% prefer oral PrEP to other options, including those in development, that is condoms, LA injectable PrEP and PrEP implants [ 16 , 17 ]. A review of qualitative data from potential PrEP users, including AGYW, highlights that individual “preference” to use oral PrEP depends on how conveniently it can be incorporated into everyday life [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this cohort that studied oral PrEP preference, uptake, adherence and continuation, nearly half of AGYW preferred oral PrEP to other biomedical prevention methods, but uptake, adherence and PrEP continuation were low. Studies among men who have sex with men (MSM) show that 25–36% prefer oral PrEP to other options, including those in development, that is condoms, LA injectable PrEP and PrEP implants [ 16 , 17 ]. A review of qualitative data from potential PrEP users, including AGYW, highlights that individual “preference” to use oral PrEP depends on how conveniently it can be incorporated into everyday life [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is inconsistent with some studies reporting that LAI-PrEP is a less preferred modality than other mediations [ 37 – 39 ]. There are also some studies reporting that LAI-PrEP is a less preferred choice [ 19 , 20 , 22 , 27 ]. In addition, a previous study revealed that the availability of LAI-PrEP would increase PrEP interest by 24.5% over oral PrEP alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also identified significant associations between the number of male sex partners, the HIV serological status of male sex partners, recreational drug use, HSV-2 infection status, and the willingness to take LAI-PrEP among MSM with oral PrEP experience. Previous studies reported on factors associated with MSM’ willingness to take LAI-PrEP or the preference for LAI-PrEP, including demographic (e.g., age [ 22 , 31 , 35 ], ethnicity [ 23 , 33 , 35 , 39 ], educational level [ 21 , 27 , 34 ], income [ 22 ], and insurance [ 39 ]), behavioural (e.g., sex roles [ 20 , 31 ], number of male sexual partners [ 34 , 35 ], HIV serological status of male sex partners [ 21 ], condom use [ 19 ], and HIV testing [ 20 ]), HIV risk perception-related [ 21 , 27 ], and PrEP-related factors (e.g., PrEP use experience [ 22 , 27 , 33 , 35 ]). The factors, such as demographic characteristics and HIV-related behaviours, in this study were similar to those in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies about acceptability from LMIC indicate a preference for long-acting prevention methods generally, these did not specifically consider LA-CAB and its specific logistical considerations for service delivery, which will require more human and financial resources, and will increase costs [39,43,44].…”
Section: Preexposure Prophylaxis Service Delivery Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%