2017
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2017.1382642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing for the Future: National Library of Medicine's® Project to Add MeSH® RDF URIs to its Bibliographic and Authority Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The year 2018 revealed five linked data projects in the literature review. Boehr and Bushman [151] reported on the National Library of Medicine’s project to add Medical Subject Headings RDF Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) to its bibliographic and authority records. Mi and Pollock [152] presented a linked data project implemented by the University of South Florida Libraries to a collection of cultural heritage and three-dimensional (3D) digital models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The year 2018 revealed five linked data projects in the literature review. Boehr and Bushman [151] reported on the National Library of Medicine’s project to add Medical Subject Headings RDF Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) to its bibliographic and authority records. Mi and Pollock [152] presented a linked data project implemented by the University of South Florida Libraries to a collection of cultural heritage and three-dimensional (3D) digital models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The library community is working to improve the Linked Data functionality of existing MARC 21 bibliographic records by enriching them with URIs, including subject metadata fields. 10 Recent publications include reports of converting the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) MARC 21 records to BIBFRAME, comparative evaluations of Linked Data ontologies and data models as they apply to MARC, and discussion of the future of authority control in libraries in the Linked Data environment. 11 Zeng and Mayr shared results of their review of how existing knowledge organization systems used in library metadata (including subject controlled vocabularies) can transition to become Linked Open Data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also includes 4 subfields 75% of which were added to support Linked Data functionality: $g Miscellaneous information (added in 2014), $0 Authority record control number or standard number (added in 2007, redefined in 2010 to allow for URI as a data value), $1 Real World Object URI (added in 2017), $4 Relationship (added in 2005 as Relator code, renamed and redescribed in 2017 for recording of relationship URIs). In the years after official transition to RDA, the library cataloging community has been encouraged to actively use these subfields (e.g., Shieh & Reese, 2015; Boehr & Bushman, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction and Background Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%