2020
DOI: 10.1111/cpsp.12314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prescriptive authority for psychologists: Can we avert disaster?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the slow but steady advance of RxP over the years, skepticism of the field remains (Heiby, 2017; Klepac, 2020; Levin, 2019; McKay, 2020; Robiner et al, 2020). Such skepticism is not always harmful to RxP but in fact could be helpful, as it potentially provides valuable feedback.…”
Section: Historical and Recent Critiques Of Rxpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the slow but steady advance of RxP over the years, skepticism of the field remains (Heiby, 2017; Klepac, 2020; Levin, 2019; McKay, 2020; Robiner et al, 2020). Such skepticism is not always harmful to RxP but in fact could be helpful, as it potentially provides valuable feedback.…”
Section: Historical and Recent Critiques Of Rxpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in comparison to the other prescribing professions, they had less training in foundational sciences (i.e., undergraduate sciences). Klepac (2020) and McKay (2020) agreed that RxP training is insufficient and puts the public at risk. Robiner et al recommended that it “should more closely resemble training of other prescribers (e.g., ARNPs)” (p. 14).…”
Section: Historical and Recent Critiques Of Rxpmentioning
confidence: 99%