Preserving Author Editing History Using Blockchain Technology

Pozi, Muhammad Syafiq Mohd; Muruti, Gopinath; Bakar, Asmidar Abu; Jatowt, Adam; Kawai, Yukiko

doi:10.1145/3197026.3197068

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Reference [87] suggests using adaptable blockchainbased choreographies for collaborative, reproducible in silico experiments towards both Robust Accountable Reproducible Explained (RARE) research [235] and Findable Accessible Interoperable Reusable (FAIR) results. Second, at paper authoring stage, [88] presents a blockchain platform that preserves and measures author contributions based on the edits that authors commit. Third, at the peer-review stage, blockchain system can also stimulate a timely and sustainable review process.…”

Section: ) Science Innovation and Ip Protectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The records that writers submit to the blockchain describe asset attributes. They can be static attributes, e.g., the authorship of a research manuscript [88], or dynamic values resulting from continuous monitoring, e.g., DarkWeb status reporting for Cyber security insurance [130]. An important common category of records involve asset exchange transactions, e.g., in commerce market [135], [137].…”

Section: B Writersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some of the surveyed systems also apply symmetric key encryption to preserve content privacy, such as records in a blockchain system that preserves author contributions on paper editing [88] and records in a supply chain use case [155].…”

Section: ) Encryption For Content Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ARK [250] blockchain was selected to record higher education course credits records [81] due to its flexibility in the number of programming languages its client implementations support. Reference [88] presents a system that measures research paper author contributions using the NEM [251] smart asset platform which is another blockchain that provide flexible business logic capability.…”

Section: ) Other Blockchainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Inclusion of transactions encourages the user to use the crypto tokens instead of merely holding them. A research manuscript editing record system [88] is based on the NEM blockchain platform that uses proof-ofimportance consensus.…”

Section: ) Proof-of-importancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Blockchain for Cities—A Systematic Literature Review

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blockchain is considered one of the most disruptive technologies of our time. Numerous cities around the world are launching blockchain initiatives as part of the overall efforts toward shaping the urban future. However, the infancy stage of the blockchain industry leads to a severe gap between the knowledge we have and the actions urban policy makers are taking. This paper is an effort to narrow this rift. We provide a systematic literature review on concrete blockchain use cases proposed by the research community. At the macro-level, we discuss and organize use cases from 159 selected papers into nine sectors recognized as crucial for sustainable and smart urban future. At the micro-level, we identify a component-based framework and analyze the design and prototypes of blockchain systems studied in a subset of 71 papers. The high-level use case review allows us to illustrate the relationship between them and the four pillars of urban sustainability: social, economic, environmental, and governmental. The system level analysis helps us highlight interesting inconsistencies between well-known blockchain applicability decision rules and the approaches taken by the literature. We also offer two classification methodologies for blockchain use cases and elaborate on how they can be applied to stimulate cross-sector insights in the blockchain knowledge domain.INDEX TERMS Bitcoin, blockchain, computer networks, consensus, crypto token, distributed computing, Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, systematic literature review, smart city, smart contract, system analysis and design, peer-to-peer computing, urban sustainability, use case.

show abstract

Section: ) Science Innovation and Ip Protectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: B Writersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Encryption For Content Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Other Blockchainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Proof-of-importancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Blockchain for Cities—A Systematic Literature Review

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Blockchain-Based Collaboration Framework for Teaching Material Creation

Chou

Lin

Nakaguchi

et al. 2021

Learning and Collaboration Technologies: New Challenges and Learning Experiences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Revolutionising the Approach to Smart Campus Architecture Through IoT and Blockchain Technologies

Alkhammash

Alshahrani

Beloff

et al. 2022

Transformations Through Blockchain Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rapid development in advanced technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and Blockchain, has led to a growth of interest in a number of application areas, including smart environments such as a smart campus, which can be considered as an example of a smart city. Despite such growth, no comprehensive guiding framework has been developed for emerging IoT and Blockchain technologies deployment in the smart campus environment, particularly in relation to security and privacy aspects, as well as to the mitigation of known problems with IoT and Blockchain in existing applications. This chapter proposes a novel architecture framework for the IoT and Blockchain applications deployed within a smart campus environment, comparing the main technologies involved. As a specific example, this framework is tested for integration of Blockchain and other relevant technologies into the Higher education certificating system for issuing authentic, verifiable and sharable student credentials. The existing certificating systems are marked by their lack of speed and low reliability and, in certain educational systems, they produce social and cultural conflicts. The proposed Blockchain-based student certification system is aimed to address these existing problems. Specific higher education institutes in Saudi Arabia were used as a case study to present a certificate validation and sharing framework that guarantees authenticity through leveraging the privacy and security features of a Blockchain network. The proposed solution was validated with the user acceptance study. Two groups of participants, employers and academic users, with a majority of female respondents, were included in this empirical study focusing on the evaluation of the proposed framework, assessing the potential for Blockchain adoption in Higher education. The validity and reliability of the framework was tested using a sequential mixed methods design involving the collection of qualitative interview data and quantitative survey data. The results of this study are particularly useful in the context of developing countries. It is expected that the proposed framework will have useful applications in a variety of fields, where it is necessary to determine whether a satisfactory level of IoT and Blockchain technologies has been achieved and maintained in accordance with the relevant safety and security standards.

show abstract

Preserving Author Editing History Using Blockchain Technology

Cited by 9 publications

References 8 publications

Blockchain for Cities—A Systematic Literature Review

Blockchain for Cities—A Systematic Literature Review

A Blockchain-Based Collaboration Framework for Teaching Material Creation

Revolutionising the Approach to Smart Campus Architecture Through IoT and Blockchain Technologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About