1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2828(87)80757-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure effects on the interactions of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium transport enzyme with calcium and para-nitrophenyl phosphate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As cytoskeletal microtubules appear to influence BK channel gating (Kitzmiller and Rosenberg, 1997), high pressure might conceivably act by the same route. A -AV of 105 ml mol-1 is also consistent with the dissociation of a ligand, perhaps an endogenous blocker (Methfessel and Boheim, 1982), or with conformational changes in proteins (Jonas and Jonas, 1994;Gross and Jaenicke, 1994;Weber, 1993;Van Eldik et al, 1989;Hasselbach and Stephan, 1987). Finally, as the mobility of ions in aqueous solution is not affected by the pressure used here (Brummer and Hills, 1961), and as the BK channel conductance is not affected by 900 atm (like alamethicin channels at 1000 atm; Brunner and Hall, 1983), there is no reason to suppose that the geometry of the BK channel pore is affected by pressure.…”
Section: Figure 3 Effect Of Pressure On the Channel Open Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As cytoskeletal microtubules appear to influence BK channel gating (Kitzmiller and Rosenberg, 1997), high pressure might conceivably act by the same route. A -AV of 105 ml mol-1 is also consistent with the dissociation of a ligand, perhaps an endogenous blocker (Methfessel and Boheim, 1982), or with conformational changes in proteins (Jonas and Jonas, 1994;Gross and Jaenicke, 1994;Weber, 1993;Van Eldik et al, 1989;Hasselbach and Stephan, 1987). Finally, as the mobility of ions in aqueous solution is not affected by the pressure used here (Brummer and Hills, 1961), and as the BK channel conductance is not affected by 900 atm (like alamethicin channels at 1000 atm; Brunner and Hall, 1983), there is no reason to suppose that the geometry of the BK channel pore is affected by pressure.…”
Section: Figure 3 Effect Of Pressure On the Channel Open Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The highest pressure used here has a negligible effect on the pH of Tris buffer (Disteche, 1972). The Ca + EGTA -CaEGTA association reaction involves a AV of +20.4 ml mol-1 (Hasselbach and Stephan, 1987), and accordingly its equilibrium constant is halved by 900 atm, doubling the free calcium concentration. At the negligible level used here…”
Section: Figure 3 Effect Of Pressure On the Channel Open Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding reaction of a buffer to a ligand is influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, pH and pressure. As the pH of any solution typically changes with pressure, hydrostatic pressure affects the free calcium ion concentration both directly [ 15 ] and through a change in pH [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Pressure-dependence of pH due to pressure effects on HEPES according to Eq (14) [ 17 ] using the Δ i v determined by Kitamura et al [ 16 ]. The development of the equilibrium constant of EGTA binding to Ca 2+ is estimated by Eq (16) using the Δ r v determined by Hasselbach et al [ 15 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation