52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-1813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Testing of a Minimum Gauge PRSEUS Panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first two values matched exactly the levels used in the pristine panel testing. 7 Note, that for pressure loadings it is customary to designate double of the limit load as the ultimate load, while for tension loadings the ratio between the two loading levels is typically 1.5.…”
Section: A Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The first two values matched exactly the levels used in the pristine panel testing. 7 Note, that for pressure loadings it is customary to designate double of the limit load as the ultimate load, while for tension loadings the ratio between the two loading levels is typically 1.5.…”
Section: A Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated before, an existing Nastran FE model of the pressure panel used in its pristine configuration studies 7 was made available and, to expedite FE analysis development, served as a precursor for developing the repaired panel model. By analogy to the previously detailed Abaqus model, four-node and three-node shell elements CQUAD4 and CTRIA3 were used instead Abaqus S4R5 and S3 elements, respectively.…”
Section: A Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations