Preventing technical debt with the TAP framework for Technical Debt Aware Management

Lean and Agile Software Development for Managing Technical Debt on A Large-scale Software: A Systematic Literature Review

“…The TAP Framework is a framework for managing technical debt/TD, and it was developed and established in an IT unit in early 2018. The focus of the IT unit that developed this framework is on systems that support advertising in print, online, and mobile media, a volatile and competitive market [42]. The TAP Framework flows can be seen in Figure 8.…”

“…This framework is easy to implement and use for organizations that have small-scale software. [42]. The LTD framework is more comprehensive but guides all aspects of TDM, including identification, prioritization, and reduction of TD.…”

Technical debt prioritization: methods, techniques, and a large exploratory study

“…Conceptual /Introductory (Gomes et al, 2011), (Seaman, Yuepu Guo, et al, 2012), (Morgenthaler et al, 2012), (Falessi, Shaw, et al, 2013), (Daneva et al, 2013), (Ernst et al, 2015), (Martini and Bosch, 2015a), (Martini and Bosch, 2015b), (Leppanen et al, 2015), (Fernández-Sánchez, Garbajosa, et al, 2015), (Martini, Bosch, and Chaudron, 2015), (Riegel and Doerr, 2015), (Martini and Bosch, 2016), (Garousi and Mäntylä, 2016), (Brauer et al, 2017), (Martini and Bosch, 2017), (Hormann et al, 2017), (Becker et al, 2018), (R. d. Almeida et al, 2018), (Pina, Seaman, et al, 2022), (S. Freire, Rios, Pérez, Torres, et al, 2021), (Mandic et al, 2021), (M. Stochel et al, 2022), (Albuquerque et al, 2022), (Wiese et al, 2022), , (S. Freire, Rios, Pérez, Castellanos, et al, 2023), (Alfayez, Winn, et al, 2023(Costa et al, 2022, (Tsintzira et al, 2020), (De Toledo et al, 2022) Mathematical /Statistical (Schmid, 2013), (Fontana et al, 2015), (Skourletopoulos, Chatzimisios, et al, 2015), (Akbarinasaji, 2015), (Mohan et al, 2016), (Codabux and Williams, 2016) Code Metrics (Zazworka, Seaman, and Shull, 2011), (Snipes et al, 2012), (Falessi and Voegele, 2015), (Chatzigeorgiou et al, 2015),…”

“…R. d. Almeida et al, 2019;M. G. Stochel, Cholda, et al, 2020;Wiese et al, 2022), defining a framework for it.…”

“…Framework (Leppanen et al, 2015), (Fernández-Sánchez, Garbajosa, et al, 2015), (Martini, Bosch, and Chaudron, 2015), (Martini and Bosch, 2016), (Brauer et al, 2017), (Martini and Bosch, 2017), (Hormann et al, 2017), (R. d. Almeida et al, 2018), (R. R. d. , , (M. G. Stochel, Cholda, et al, 2020), (S. Freire, Rios, Gutierrez, et al, 2020), (Mandic et al, 2021), (Wiese et al, 2022) Artificial Intelligence (Akbarinasaji, 2015), (Codabux and Williams, 2016), (Mohan et al, 2016), (Kouros et al, 2019), (Alfayez and Boehm, 2019) Cost-Benefit (Zazworka, Seaman, and Shull, 2011), (Snipes et al, 2012), (Skourletopoulos, Mavromoustakis, et al, 2016), (Yli-Huumo et al, 2016), (L. F. Ribeiro et al, 2017), (Plösch et al, 2018) Historical (Falessi and Voegele, 2015), (Choudhary and P. Singh, 2016), (Charalampidou et al, 2017), (Tornhill, 2018) Portfolio Approach (Yuepu , (Plösch et al, 2018) (Brauer et al, 2017), (Albarak and Bahsoon, 2018) Options (Fernández-Sánchez, Díaz, et al, 2014), (Abad and Ruhe, 2015), (Aldaeej and Seaman, 2018) The papers discuss ways to standardize the technical debt prioritization process in the Framework category. Most of the frameworks developed consist in finding technical debt items, measuring their payment cost and interest (Fernández-Sánchez, Garbajosa, et al, 2015) (Leppanen et al, 2015) (Martini and Bosch, 2016).…”