2021
DOI: 10.1002/wilm.10930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing and Rick Analysis in Hyperbolic Local Volatility Model with Quasi‐Monte Carlo

Abstract: Local volatility models usually capture the surface of implied volatilities more accurately than other approaches, such as stochastic volatility models. We present the results of application of Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi‐Monte Carlo (QMC) methods for derivative pricing and risk analysis based on Hyperbolic Local Volatility Model. In high‐dimensional integration QMC shows a superior performance over MC if the effective dimension of an integrand is not too large. In application to derivative pricing and computat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here ν > 0 is the level of volatility, and β ∈ (0, 1] is the skew parameter. First introduced in Jäckel [31], this behaves similarly to the constant elasticity of variance (CEV), this model and has been widely used in quantitative finance for numerical experiments in Hok et al [25,26,24]. A practical advantage of this model is that zero is not an attainable boundary, which in turn avoids some numerical instabilities present in the CEV model when the underlying asset price is close to zero (see e.g.…”
Section: Time-homogeneous Hyperbolic Local Volatility Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here ν > 0 is the level of volatility, and β ∈ (0, 1] is the skew parameter. First introduced in Jäckel [31], this behaves similarly to the constant elasticity of variance (CEV), this model and has been widely used in quantitative finance for numerical experiments in Hok et al [25,26,24]. A practical advantage of this model is that zero is not an attainable boundary, which in turn avoids some numerical instabilities present in the CEV model when the underlying asset price is close to zero (see e.g.…”
Section: Time-homogeneous Hyperbolic Local Volatility Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%