2021
DOI: 10.1111/iej.13565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: explanation and elaboration

Abstract: Guidance to authors is needed to prevent their waste of talent, time and resources in writing manuscripts that will never be published in the highest‐quality journals. Laboratory studies are probably the most common type of endodontic research projects because they make up the majority of manuscripts submitted for publication. Unfortunately, most of these manuscripts fail the peer‐review process, primarily due to critical flaws in the reporting of the methods and results. Here, in order to guide authors, the P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was selected according to a previous study with a power effect of 88.4 (it is considered acceptable from 80) [28]. The manuscript of this laboratory study has been written according to 2021 Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology (PRILE) guidelines (Figure 1) [29,30]. In addition, the study was conducted in accordance with the principles defined in the German Ethics Committee's statement for the use of organic tissues in medical research (Zentrale Ethikkommission, 2003) and was authorized by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University Alfonso X el Sabio (Madrid, Spain), in October 2020 (Process No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was selected according to a previous study with a power effect of 88.4 (it is considered acceptable from 80) [28]. The manuscript of this laboratory study has been written according to 2021 Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology (PRILE) guidelines (Figure 1) [29,30]. In addition, the study was conducted in accordance with the principles defined in the German Ethics Committee's statement for the use of organic tissues in medical research (Zentrale Ethikkommission, 2003) and was authorized by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University Alfonso X el Sabio (Madrid, Spain), in October 2020 (Process No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain statistically significant differences with a power effect of 80.00% to detect differences between the null hypothesis H 0 : μ 1 = μ 2 via a bilateral Student’s t -test of two independent samples, taking into account a significance level of 5.00%, 138 osteotomy site preparations were included in the study. The resulting manuscript for this study was written in accordance with the 2021 Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory Studies in Endodontology (PRILE) guidelines [ 18 , 19 ]. In addition, the in vitro study was conducted as per the principles laid out in the German Ethics Committee’s statement on the use of organic tissues in medical research (Zentrale Ethikkommission, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, the Preferred Reporting Items for study Designs in Endodontology (PRIDE) team developed specific reporting guidelines for endodontic laboratory studies, with the goal of ensuring that laboratory studies in endodontology were described comprehensively and that details of methodology were transparent. The Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology (PRILE) guidelines were published in September 2021 (Nagendrababu et al, 2021). These guidelines consist of 40 items in 11 sections arranged in a checklist, along with a flowchart.…”
Section: A Structured Approach To Experimental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%