2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary pulmonary leiomyosarcoma: A population-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also observed in a previous study of 183 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder . We also found that most of the patient population was white (83.2%), which was also consistent with the findings from the previous study . However, sex, primary site, laterality, and year of diagnosis were not related to the OS and CSS of PL‐LMS patients via multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were also observed in a previous study of 183 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder . We also found that most of the patient population was white (83.2%), which was also consistent with the findings from the previous study . However, sex, primary site, laterality, and year of diagnosis were not related to the OS and CSS of PL‐LMS patients via multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Localized stage was associated with better OS and CSS than advanced stage. The previous study also reported that advanced stage was a poor prognostic factor for OS and CSS in leiomyosarcoma patients . Partial resection and radical excision or resection of the lesion with limb salvage were related to better OS and CSS compared with PL‐LMS patients without surgery..…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall survival information was also identified and extracted from the SEER database, which was defined as the interval from diagnosis until death or the last follow-up. 7 Because the SEER research data are publicly available and all data are deidentified, institutional review board approval and informed consent are not required for this study. In addition, all authors have signed the research agreement form and received permission from the SEER to access the database.…”
Section: Methods and Materials Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%