1996
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-199604000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principle, Validity, and Reliability of Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
148
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Past research into HRF may not be directly comparable to our results due to the use of varied cursor sizes ranging from 2 × 2 28 pixels to 50 × 50 pixels, 29 the use of modified HRF devices with different types of laser heads (670 nm, 16 default 780 nm, 30 790 nm 16 ) and different study designs or statistical methods. Iester and colleagues used AFFPIA software with full-field option, appropriate reliability experimental design, and calculated reliability as a coefficient of variation (CoV) ranging from 3.8-20.7% across different sections of the retina in a sample of healthy and glaucomatous eyes 31 Using a different statistical approach, our reliability of ICC 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) for capillary flow measured using AFFPIA full-field in healthy eyes is sufficiently high for repeated measures by the same observer, although this estimate is not directly comparable to the CoV values reported by other studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Past research into HRF may not be directly comparable to our results due to the use of varied cursor sizes ranging from 2 × 2 28 pixels to 50 × 50 pixels, 29 the use of modified HRF devices with different types of laser heads (670 nm, 16 default 780 nm, 30 790 nm 16 ) and different study designs or statistical methods. Iester and colleagues used AFFPIA software with full-field option, appropriate reliability experimental design, and calculated reliability as a coefficient of variation (CoV) ranging from 3.8-20.7% across different sections of the retina in a sample of healthy and glaucomatous eyes 31 Using a different statistical approach, our reliability of ICC 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) for capillary flow measured using AFFPIA full-field in healthy eyes is sufficiently high for repeated measures by the same observer, although this estimate is not directly comparable to the CoV values reported by other studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…2) in accordance with the methods outlined elsewhere. 12,15,16,23,25,26 Briefly, AFFPIA calculates the Doppler frequency shift of the hemodynamic flow of each pixel from the entire image, while the standard HRF software only analyzes within a given small-framed area (i.e., the pixel cursor). For a valid estimation of retinal blood flow, AFFPIA, unlike the HRF software, adjusts brightness to mask under-or over-exposed pixels.…”
Section: Image Analysis Methods and Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a noninvasive, high-resolution mapping technique estimating capillary blood flow of the ONH and retina with an acceptable reliability [62][63][64] and adequate ability to show blood flow alterations. Moreover, in our study we used a central alignment technique described by Sehi and Flanagan, 50 which allows an optimal focal plane for the flowmetry of the NRR and peripapillary retina and more repeatable measurements of the blood flow at these levels.…”
Section: Effect On Onh Head and Retinal Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are predominantly four basic methods to assess ocular perfusion: the evaluation of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) by the method of Langham,3,4 scanning laser Doppler flowmetric techniques like the Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter, 5 fluorescence angiographic procedures, 6,7 and colour Doppler imaging (CDI). 8 Despite technical progress, none of the available techniques mentioned above allows one to measure ocular perfusion directly and quantitatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%