Priorities of the logistics risks management in the resource support of construction projects

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of the logistics risks management in the resource support of construction projects based on the complex accounting of modern approaches to the management of functional areas of logistics and supply chains. It is argued that these issues have not been provided with sufficient attention in the academic publications. The state of the construction industry is examined, and critical analysis is carried out. The distinctive features of risks associated with the provision of construction services, due to their intangible components are characterized. The institutional specifics of regulation in the sphere of construction services are disclosed, and the limits of management of logistics risks through the use of special software are justified. The priorities for managing such risks in the resource support of construction projects are set. The targeted nature of the international quality standards regulation for the management of the organization's risk on the basis of a systematic approach has been argued. The authors point out integration of the risk management in the management of sustainable development of enterprises as an independent functional unit. The necessity of differentiating the management of the design logistics risks in the resource support of construction, and the risk management in the operational logistics activities carried out in course of the implementation of construction projects is substantiated. The contract strategy of the resource support for construction projects, which determines the rules of coordination of the project conditions of supply contracts, logistic coordination of deliveries, procurement placement (including the rationale for the methods of such placement) and rapid response to negative logistics precedents is characterized in the paper. It is concluded that there is a need to coordinate supplies in the projects' resource support system, taking into account the specificity of the functional cycles of logistics and the applicability of alternative methods of intervening in the operational logistics activities.  Corresponding author: lenina424@yandex.ru

Integral approach of assessment of interaction level of stakeholders of construction enterprises

“…You select the View-Toolbars-PERT Analysis commands in sequence to use it. The analysis can be actually represented as the following algorithm (Cheung and Qi, 2017;Kubasova et al, 2018;Demenev et al, 2019): The pessimistic scenario takes into account the highest values of these indicators in the identifier based on the results of expert assessments.…”

Assessment of Collaboration-Based and Non-Collaboration-Based Logistics Risks with Plithogenic SWARA Method

“…In these conditions, it has become important to analyze risks better for logistics firms to succeed. There are several studies about logistics risks in the literature [12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, in this study, a new MCDM method, the Plithogenic SWARA method, was introduced to the literature.…”

“…These risks were classified as physical, financial, informational, relational, and innovational, respectively. Kubasova et al [15] considered risk management as the sustainability of businesses. In this context, they examined logistics risks as a source of structural support.…”

“…Chand et al [14] explored the risks and uncertainties in a supply chain of Indian companies by using Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) methods. Kubasova et al [15] discussed logistics risk in construction projects. Khan et al [16] identified the risk factors related to halal food supply chains and prioritized them with fuzzy AHP.…”

Institutional fundamentals of authorized supply chains formation

“…Wide development of the RF market by Chinese enterprises demands from them more active logistics position. It must foresee establishment of international supply chains under the authority thereof and organization of well coordinated contract-based management with the use of ISO standards [15,16]. At the same time, for the time being is it quixotic to expect total transition, in Chinese enterprises' attitude to FEA, from one-off deal to far-reaching transformations in the sphere of customs administration in China and the RF.…”