Priority Analysis of Small Dams Construction using Cluster Analysis, AHP and Weighted Average Method Case Study: Small Dams in Semarang District

Anjasmoro, Bima; Suharyanto, Suharyanto; Sangkawati, Sri

doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.477

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ghimire and Kim (2018) used the AHP to rank barriers to the development of renewable energy in Nepal (Ghimire & Kim, 2018). Anjasmoro, Suharyanto, and Sangkawati (2017) asserted that eight areas suffered from severe water shortages after years of feasibility studies in the Semarang region in Indonesia, and a small emergency dam had to be built within a limited time and with restricted funds. In this case, the AHP was used to analyse the priorities in the construction of a dam (Anjasmoro et al, 2017).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying critical risk factors and responses of river dredging projects for knowledge management within organisation

Chou

Chiu

2021

J Flood Risk Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A river exhibits strong upstream erosion and rapid downstream accumulation. Dredging is one of the methods that is most commonly adopted by the Taiwan Water Resources Agency (WRA) to ensure the smooth flow of rivers and their ability to discharge water, protecting lives and property from flood disasters. However, dredging projects are large, involving very many stakeholders, leading to high uncertainty in the implementation of the project. The WRA also lacks relevant risk management methods and countermeasures owing to the periodical brain drain and retirement within the organisation. In order to enhance risk management for dredging engineers, river management offices across the country were visited, and knowledge and experience of dredging engineering were obtained using expert meetings and scientific methods. Work was carried out with the WRA to identify six major risk categories for dredging projects, covering 30 risks. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) questionnaire was developed using the Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS), and a Risk Impact/Frequency Analysis (RIFA) questionnaire was developed using the Important/Performance Analysis (IPA) method; these were answered by 69 engineers with experience in river dredging. Finally, critical risk factors are identified and ranked by combining the responses to the questionnaires and in the interviews, helping engineers with risk management in the future. Research results demonstrate that most of the engineering management experience in practice is communicated by word of mouth, with no effective and systematic method of knowledge management. Therefore, a knowledge‐based system is created, covering 170 risk events and solutions for various dredging projects, and a graphical user information system is built in a programming language, to enable the WRA to save engineering experience systematically for future exploitation.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying critical risk factors and responses of river dredging projects for knowledge management within organisation

Chou

Chiu

2021

J Flood Risk Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…: Saudi Arabia [35] Loc. : Bortala, China [13] Influence Factors (CRITERIA) Variable (SUB-CRITERIA) [36] Loc. : - [31] Loc.…”

Section: Criteria In Mcdm Developed For Priority Determination and Selection Of Dam Construction Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Criteria on Multi Criteria Decision Making (Mcdm) Construction of Dams

Santoso¹

2019

GEOMATE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complexity of dam construction leads to special attention when it comes to constructing in terms of determining the priority scale of development if there are several alternative locations related to various criteria. These criteria include: technical (engineering), economic, social, cultural, environmental, legal, institutional and even political criteria. Some experts have pointed out that the selection of dams associated with the site requires significant empirical input from experts and specialists in the form of heuristic rules, expert opinions and conclusions, and applicable rules. This problem can be solved by using the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach. MCDM or Multiple-Criteria-Decision-Analysis (MCDA) is expressed as a decision-making method to establish the best alternative of a number of alternatives based on certain criteria. Some of the models included in the popular MCDM used today are: Scoring Model, Analytic Herarchy Process (AHP), Analytic Network Process (ANP), Utility Model, Out Ranking Method, and Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and others. The application of MCDM in relation to the analysis of priorities for dam construction (best location determination) has also been developed. An appropriate method for determining priority scale of dam construction is needed so that the built construct is based on complexity and multi dimension. This paper will discuss some of the studies that have been done in determining the priority scale of dam construction with the MCDM approach and will provide an overview of the possibility of further research that can be done

show abstract

“…The AHP has been successful applied in various fields [20][21][22][23]. This method has been used frequently for irrigation-related study field [11,[24][25][26][27][28]. AHP is also applied to water pricing to improve water quality [29].…”

Section: Multi-criteria Decision Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, the urgency level of irrigation assets in wider irrigation areas is less urgent compared to a narrower irrigation area [10]. Operating irrigation systems needs substantial funds; government must allocate a substantial budget for O&M irrigation systems [11,12]. Currently, Indonesia government sets cost allocation O & M based on the large area of irrigation and it has not considered the level of the density of structure [9,11,13,14], therefore it is possible cause the unbalanced of allocating in cross-irrigation areas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Operating irrigation systems needs substantial funds; government must allocate a substantial budget for O&M irrigation systems [11,12]. Currently, Indonesia government sets cost allocation O & M based on the large area of irrigation and it has not considered the level of the density of structure [9,11,13,14], therefore it is possible cause the unbalanced of allocating in cross-irrigation areas. Unfairness in this case is that irrigation with large areas will receive more budget allocation despite having shorter maintenance channel and fewer structures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Budgeting Formulation of Irrigation’s Operation and Maintenance Cost in Indonesia Based on Area Index and Structure Index

Edhisono¹,

Sachro²,

Hadihardaja³

et al. 2019

IJAST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyzes the difference of Operation & Maintenance (O&M) costs between government's budgeting method and an alternative approach using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP was used to determine the formula of budget distribution by considering irrigation infrastructure, location of irrigation area. The formulation was calculated based on the observation to samples in West Java, Central Java and East Java, three provinces that have significant agricultural contributions in Indonesia. Irrigation areas characteristics assessed were areas, channels, weirs and hydraulic structures. The result shows that the equation had an exceptional different linier relationship compared with the quadratic relation equation. They were far more reasonable having a linier proportionality between the budget and the amount of infrastructure. The conclusion also integrates with the linier relationship. Thus, while the precise equation are not intended to be universal applicable, the most important finding was how O & M budget was correlated positively to the amount of infrastructure, not only depending on the area of irrigation.

show abstract

Priority Analysis of Small Dams Construction using Cluster Analysis, AHP and Weighted Average Method Case Study: Small Dams in Semarang District

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

Identifying critical risk factors and responses of river dredging projects for knowledge management within organisation

Identifying critical risk factors and responses of river dredging projects for knowledge management within organisation

Review of Criteria on Multi Criteria Decision Making (Mcdm) Construction of Dams

Budgeting Formulation of Irrigation’s Operation and Maintenance Cost in Indonesia Based on Area Index and Structure Index

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About