2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priority knowledge needs for implementing nature-based solutions in the Mediterranean islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By sharing existing successful examples of NbS implementation, the platform is extending this knowledge to practitioners and the research community [21]. ReNature has produced a number of significant outputs in topics related to the key areas of the NbS concept, in the form of a multi-stakeholder consultation exercise to identify priority knowledge needs and barriers preventing wider implementation of NbS in Mediterranean islands [22]; an open-source compendium [20]; a blueprint for socially and economically viable NbS [23], and an NbS impacts toolbox. These tools are expected to shape an approach for knowledge transition and knowledge co-creation that is based on values, principles and practices essential to respond effectively to current and future challenges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By sharing existing successful examples of NbS implementation, the platform is extending this knowledge to practitioners and the research community [21]. ReNature has produced a number of significant outputs in topics related to the key areas of the NbS concept, in the form of a multi-stakeholder consultation exercise to identify priority knowledge needs and barriers preventing wider implementation of NbS in Mediterranean islands [22]; an open-source compendium [20]; a blueprint for socially and economically viable NbS [23], and an NbS impacts toolbox. These tools are expected to shape an approach for knowledge transition and knowledge co-creation that is based on values, principles and practices essential to respond effectively to current and future challenges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are expected to shape an approach for knowledge transition and knowledge co-creation that is based on values, principles and practices essential to respond effectively to current and future challenges. Notwithstanding the current high degree of focus on policy, the mainstreaming of NbS into policy, planning and practice has remained at a relatively low level, and often vitiated by limited knowledge of their potential effects [22,24]. Greater uptake relies on the identification of appropriate means of implementation as well as on identifying and tackling any knowledge gaps impeding implementation within the applicable spheres, including government, business and environmental NGOs [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Vercruysse et al (2019) developed the 'interoperability' concept, which analyse the context and built environment to indicate the priority sites for BGI in the city of Newcastle (UK) (Dawson et al 2020). Other tools can be seen in Colléony & Shwartz (2019), Cortinovis & Geneletti (2020) and Grace et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NBS implementation requires social, political, economic, and scientific challenges to be addressed simultaneously by several actor groups (Norton et al 2015), considering every situation with individuality and in context (Debele et al 2019). For Grace et al (2021) and Cortinovis & Geneletti (2020), however, the insights of NBS uptake in policy and planning are limited, and stakeholder perspectives are lacking from current research. Findings of Kumar et al (2020) include that NBS are rarely considered a first choice by relevant stakeholders compared to other traditional approaches to reduce hydro-meteorological hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another research priority concerns the assessment of the trade-offs between services which might result from different stakeholders' objective function and management strategies [5]. Monetary valuation, ecosystem services accounting, and cost-benefit analysis are intended to inform citizens, firms, and policy makers about the contribution of forests to private and public benefits and the welfare consequences of alternative forest planning [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%