2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRISMA-7: A case-finding tool to identify older adults with moderate to severe disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
166
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
166
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…7,28,29 Second, some instruments are impractical for primary care, for example, the screening test of Moore et al, and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe -Frailty Instrument (SHARE-FI), which comprise several performance-based tests. 28,30 Third, many of these short instruments are selfassessment instruments, for example the TFI, 10 Groningen Frailty Instrument (GFI), 31 Programme de Recherche sur l'Intégration des Services pour le Maintien de l'Autonomie (PRISMA-7), 32 and the Sherbrooke postal questionnaire. 33 Self-assessment instruments have the lowest response rate in the most vulnerable group of patients, and the reliability of the information from frail patients, especially in case of cognitive problems, is questionable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,28,29 Second, some instruments are impractical for primary care, for example, the screening test of Moore et al, and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe -Frailty Instrument (SHARE-FI), which comprise several performance-based tests. 28,30 Third, many of these short instruments are selfassessment instruments, for example the TFI, 10 Groningen Frailty Instrument (GFI), 31 Programme de Recherche sur l'Intégration des Services pour le Maintien de l'Autonomie (PRISMA-7), 32 and the Sherbrooke postal questionnaire. 33 Self-assessment instruments have the lowest response rate in the most vulnerable group of patients, and the reliability of the information from frail patients, especially in case of cognitive problems, is questionable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongar o instrumento objetivando ampliar as dimensões nele contidas levaria à perda em critérios para rastreamento 18 . Não identificar a intensidade do declínio se deve à finalidade do instrumento de apenas captar o risco, ficando o diagnóstico e quantificação das limitações para uma etapa posterior 5,6 . Mesmo sendo consoante ao risco funcional, o item seis merece melhor avaliação na forma do questionamento.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Na impossibilidade do entrevistado escolher entre "sim" ou "não", hesitando entre "talvez", "às vezes" ou equivalente, o entrevistador deveria optar pelo "sim" como resposta 5 .…”
Section: Métodosunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations