Privacy protection without impairing personalization by using the extended system MASKS and the extended contextualized P3P privacy policies

Grande, Robson E. De; Zorzo, Sergio Donizetti

doi:10.1145/1186595.1186607

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…De Grande and Zorzo () designed a system that provides privacy to the user in both implicit and explicit information gathering for the purpose of personalization. The MASKS (Managing Anonymity while Sharing Knowledge to Servers) system, placed between the users and the Internet, introduces anonymity to user browsing without blocking information to the sites, by removing communication control information that identifies a user.…”

Section: Issues In Personalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personalization in text information retrieval: A survey

Liu

Belkin

2019

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personalization of information retrieval (PIR) is aimed at tailoring a search toward individual users and user groups by taking account of additional information about users besides their queries. In the past two decades or so, PIR has received extensive attention in both academia and industry. This article surveys the literature of personalization in text retrieval, following a framework for aspects or factors that can be used for personalization. The framework consists of additional information about users that can be explicitly obtained by asking users for their preferences, or implicitly inferred from users' search behaviors. Users' characteristics and contextual factors such as tasks, time, location, etc., can be helpful for personalization. This article also addresses various issues including when to personalize, the evaluation of PIR, privacy, usability, etc. Based on the extensive review, challenges are discussed and directions for future effort are suggested.

show abstract

Section: Issues In Personalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personalization in text information retrieval: A survey

Liu

Belkin

2019

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…P3P framework, a privacy protocol that standardizes privacy policy information to allow user to gain a better understanding of how websites' privacy policies match their action involved users' privacy [8], [9]. A privacy enhancing technology named Privacy Bird uses a notification process to inform a user browsing the Internet about how privacy friendly a website is [8], [10]; a P3P-based privacy preference generator [11]; a software named iWatch to protect individual privacy [12].…”

Section: A Protocols About Protecting Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Privacy Protection in E-commerce

Li¹,

Liu²

2015

JOAMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Online-purchase changed the life of customers. Ebusiness enterprises offer various personalized products to their clients through collecting private information. Customers enjoy the convenience that the personalized products bring to while suffering the risk that their privacy may be second used by firms. The conflict between consumers' privacy concern and personalization offered by firm causes many problems deserved to be studied. Many researchers study about different kinds of privacy protection. This paper analyzes the literatures and summarizes the methods of privacy protection, which are classified into two categories. The review found that, however, all these methods do not consider about consumers' profit and cannot be understood and accepted by consumers. It is raised that further study about privacy should base on consumers' behaviors and profit of firms.

show abstract

Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information privacy refers to the desire of individuals to control or have some influence over data about themselves. Advances in information technology have raised concerns about information privacy and its impacts, and have motivated Information Systems researchers to explore information privacy issues, including technical solutions to address these concerns. In this paper, we inform researchers about the current state of information privacy research in IS through a critical analysis of the IS literature that considers information privacy as a key construct. The review of the literature reveals that information privacy is a multilevel concept, but rarely studied as such. We also find that information privacy research has been heavily reliant on studentbased and USA-centric samples, which results in findings of limited generalizability. Information privacy research focuses on explaining and predicting theoretical contributions, with few studies in journal articles focusing on design and action contributions. We recommend that future research should consider different levels of analysis as well as multilevel effects of information privacy. We illustrate this with a multilevel framework for information privacy concerns. We call for research on information privacy to use a broader diversity of sampling populations, and for more design and action information privacy research to be published in journal articles that can result in IT artifacts for protection or control of information privacy.Keywords: Information privacy, privacy, level of analysis, information privacy framework, information privacy concerns Introduction 1The concept of information privacy existed long before information and communication technologies changed its occurrences, impacts, and management. In the mid-1980s, Mason (1986 suggested that the advent of the increased use of information technologies, or the Information Age, would lead to four major concerns about the use of information: privacy, accuracy, property, and accessibility (PAPA). This prediction proved to be accurate for each area, and particularly for privacy, which has been the subject of increasing concern over the years. A Pew Internet Project survey found that 85 percent of adults believed it was "very important" to control access to their personal information (Madden et al. 2007). Information privacy is also an important concern for corporations. In a survey, 85 percent of responding companies 1 M. Lynne Markus was the accepting senior editor for this paper. Paul Pavlou served as the associate editor.The appendices for this paper are located in the "Online Supplements" section of the MIS Quarterly's website (http://www.misq.org). MIS Quarterly Vol. 35 No. 4 pp. 1017-1041/December 2011 1017Belanger & Crossler/Privacy in the Digital Age experienced some sort of reportable privacy breach during the previous year; 63 percent reported multiple breaches. The majority of the reporting companies stated that they spent their time reacting to privacy breaches as opposed to being proactiv...

show abstract

Privacy protection without impairing personalization by using the extended system MASKS and the extended contextualized P3P privacy policies

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

Personalization in text information retrieval: A survey

Personalization in text information retrieval: A survey

A Review of Privacy Protection in E-commerce

Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About