1989
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2352(89)90031-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private counsels and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in conflict with the perception that private attorneys are able to best help their clients (Champion, 1989). However these findings may be explained by the heavy caseloads of indigent defense counsel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is in conflict with the perception that private attorneys are able to best help their clients (Champion, 1989). However these findings may be explained by the heavy caseloads of indigent defense counsel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is supported in research by Taylor et al (1973), Champion (1989), and Anderson and Heaton (2012), who all found that defendants with public defenders were more likely to plead guilty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Because cooperation is key within the workgroup, public de-fenders are able to negotiate favorable outcomes for their clients and in a faster amount of time (Champion, 1989;Skolnick, 1967;Taylor et al, 1973). Stover and Eckhart (1975) state that public defenders and retained counsel have similar outcomes with regard to conviction odds.…”
Section: Explanations For Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the study of the police has become a small sociological industry in itself. There have also been studies of prosecutors and their screening decisions (see, e.g., Myers and Hagan, 1979;Stanko, 1981-82); defense attorneys and how they conduct their clients' cases (see, e.g., Sudnow, 1965;Blumberg, 1967;Rosenthal, 1974;Champion, 1989); and the process of plea bargaining (see, e.g., Newman, 1956;Buckle and Buckle, 1977;Mather, 1979;Maynard, 1984). There have been studies of courtrooms (see, e.g., Mileski, 1971;Feeley, 1979), of juries (see, e.g., Simon, 1980), and of sentencing decisions (see, e.g., Bowers and Pierce, 1980;LaFree, 1980;Myers and Talarico, 1986).…”
Section: The Research Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%