Private Sector Corruption, Public Sector Corruption and the Organizational Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries

Abstract

Corporate anti-corruption initiatives can make a substantial contribution towards curtailing corruption and advancing efforts to achieve the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. However, researchers have observed that underdeveloped assumptions with respect to the conceptualization of corruption and how firms respond to corruption risk impeding the efficacy of anti-corruption programs. We investigate the relationship between the perceived level of corruption in foreign host countries and the organizational structure of subsidiary operations established by multinational corporations (MNCs). Foreign host market corruption is disaggregated into two components-private and public corruption. We employ an uncertaintybased perspective grounded in transaction cost theory to focus upon the distinct mechanisms through which private and public corruption can each be expected to impact a foreign subsidiary's organizational structure [wholly-owned subsidiary (WOS) or a joint venture (JV) with a local partner]. We expect that each type of corruption fosters a different type of uncertainty (environmental or behavioral) which predominates in shaping the MNC's choice of foreign subsidiary investment structure. Hypotheses are developed and tested with a sample of 187 entries into 19 foreign host markets. Each type of corruption was found to exert a distinct effect upon the organizational structure of foreign subsidiaries. More precisely, while heightened perceived levels of public corruption were found to motivate MNCs to invest through a JV with a local partner rather than a WOS, more pronounced private corruption precipitated the opposite outcome.

Transparent Governments, Social Innovation, and Their Role in Achieving the SDGs

“…Corruption has been identified as one of the significant components hindering sustainable development affecting the public and private sector (Frolova et al 2019;Sartor and Beamish 2019), peace and security (Basabose 2019). It negatively impacts trust in government, contributes to social inequality and poverty.…”

Dangerous Liaisons: Corruption and Money Laundering in Contemporary Society

“…This definition has gained great popularity and is also found in international anti-corruption conventions (for example, in the UN Convention against Corruption, Council of Europe documents, etc.). However, in recent years, more and more attention has been paid to corruption in the private sphere, as its size and negative effects are becoming more significant and cannot be neglected (Argandoña, 2003;Gopinath, 2008;Stoyanov, 2018;Sartor, & Beamish, 2020).…”

Anti-corruption as a variable for civil servants’ performance measurement: A systematic literature review

“…Corruption does not only happen in public sector but also in private sector because it is a deliberate action to provide fraud over particular amount on the financial report in order to decrease credibility of its report (Umar, 2012). Researchers whose work has focused on combatting corruption within NGOs have observed that prevalent forms of abuse of power (or, corruption) within this type of private sector organization include the establishment of "fictitious NGOs" solely for the purpose of generating income for the organization's executives or Board members, the receipt of kickback payments by NGO employees from prospective vendors with respect to the procurement of goods or services for the organization, and the solicitation of bribes by NGO employees from prospective beneficiaries who seek inclu-sion on NGO aid distribution lists (Sartor & Beamish, 2018). After initial skepticism, companies worldwide are now adopting programs to combat corruption.…”