2016
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-16-1339-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment for the Makran region with focus on maximum magnitude assumption

Abstract: Abstract. Despite having been rather seismically quiescent for the last decades, the Makran subduction zone is capable of hosting destructive earthquakes and tsunami. In particular, the well-known thrust event in 1945 (Balochistan earthquake) led to about 4000 casualties. Nowadays, the coastal regions are more densely populated and vulnerable to similar events. Furthermore, some recent publications discuss rare but significantly larger events at the Makran subduction zone as possible scenarios. We analyze the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis (PTHA) probably began with the seminal papers of Lin and Tung (1982) and Rikitake and Aida (1988). Uncertainty quantification is one of the main goals of PTHA, and progressively more refined uncertainty treatment was achieved following the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami (e.g., Geist and Parsons, 2006;Burbidge et al, 2008;González et al, 2009;Horspool et al, 2014;Hoechner et al, 2016;Selva et al, 2016;Davies et al, 2017;Grezio et al, 2017;Power et al, 2017). PTHA is becoming the established good practice for managing risk assessment and risk mitigation measures (Chock et al, 2016;Løvholt et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis (PTHA) probably began with the seminal papers of Lin and Tung (1982) and Rikitake and Aida (1988). Uncertainty quantification is one of the main goals of PTHA, and progressively more refined uncertainty treatment was achieved following the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami (e.g., Geist and Parsons, 2006;Burbidge et al, 2008;González et al, 2009;Horspool et al, 2014;Hoechner et al, 2016;Selva et al, 2016;Davies et al, 2017;Grezio et al, 2017;Power et al, 2017). PTHA is becoming the established good practice for managing risk assessment and risk mitigation measures (Chock et al, 2016;Løvholt et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seminal Seismic PTHA (SPTHA) was performed using crude source and tsunami representations (Lin and Tung, 1982;Rikitake and Aida, 1988;Tinti, 1991). Since then, the methodology has evolved dramatically (Geist and Parsons., 2006;Annaka et al, 2007;Power et al, 2007;Thio et al, 2007;Burbidge et al, 2008;González et al, 2009;Sørensen et al, 2012;Hoechner et al, 2016;Miyashita et al, 2020), also in the framework of large programs (e.g., Horspool et al, 2014;Basili et al, 2021). SPTHA methodology for spatio-temporal and kinematic source treatment and the basic uncertainty framework were mostly transcribed from Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA, Esteva, 1967;Cornell, 1968;a historical perspective: McGuire, 2008).…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework for modern PTHA was first presented in the pioneering work of Geist and Parsons (2006). This framework formed the basis for developing numerous PTHA research works (e.g., Burbidge et al, 2008;Otero, 2008;Taubenböck et al, 2008;Suppasri et al, 2012;Yadav et al, 2013;Horspool et al, 2014;Omira et al, 2015;Shin et al, 2015;El-Hussain et al, 2016;Griffin et al, 2016;Hoechner et al, 2016;Zamora and Babeyko, 2020). 7 years after the 2004 event, the massive 2011 Japan tsunami raised the need to consider the complexity of the earthquake rupture in the PTHA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%