Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability of Detection Model for Pipeline Inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [96,104] the POD is reported to increase with increasing magnetization level and then decrease when the magnetization level is greater than a particular value. The conclusion of this study is that the POD reaches its maximum before getting saturated.…”
Section: Pod With Respective To Magnetization Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [96,104] the POD is reported to increase with increasing magnetization level and then decrease when the magnetization level is greater than a particular value. The conclusion of this study is that the POD reaches its maximum before getting saturated.…”
Section: Pod With Respective To Magnetization Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion of this study is that the POD reaches its maximum before getting saturated. However, this is not true, because in [96,104], the background is subtracted from the measurement values, and the difference is used instead of the measurement values as signal magnitudes. Our research, as presented in the following, shows that the higher the magnetization level, the more possible a defect can be detected.…”
Section: Pod With Respective To Magnetization Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%