“…Four different ALs have been reported as forming effective electro-active complexes for the purposes of CLE-AdSCV: 1-nitroso-2-napthol (NN) (Gledhill and van den Berg, 1994), salicylaldoxime (SA) (Rue and Bruland, 1995), TAC 2-(2thiazolylazo)-p-cresol (Croot and Johansson, 2000) and 2,3dihydroxynaphthalen (DHN) (van den Berg, 2006). The two ALs, SA and TAC, are the usual selection in field studies Bruland, 1995, 1997;Croot and Johansson, 2000;Croot et al, 2004;Boye et al, 2005;Thuróczy et al, 2011aThuróczy et al, , b, 2012Kondo et al, 2012;Bundy et al, 2014Bundy et al, , 2015Buck et al, 2015Buck et al, , 2018Gerringa et al, 2015Gerringa et al, , 2017Abualhaija et al, 2015;Kleint et al, 2016;Slagter et al, 2017Slagter et al, , 2019, and basin-scale data sets now exist for K cond FeL and [L] obtained using these two ALs (Caprara et al, 2016;Cabanes et al, 2020;Schlitzer et al, 2018), which provide an important resource for our understanding of iron biogeochemistry in the ocean (Boyd and Ellwood, 2010;Boyd and Tagliabue, 2015;Völker and Tagliabue, 2015;Tagliabue et al, 2016;Lauderdale et al, 2020). However, results of intercomparisons of field data suggest that although trends may be similar for different ALs, the different methods may not be directly intercomparable as conditional [L] differed significantly, with SA giving higher [L] and often identifying more than one ligand group compared with TAC .…”