1999
DOI: 10.1002/abio.370190205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process engineering in biological aerobic waste‐water treatment

Abstract: A non-comprehensive review of several technical developments in the field of aerobic biological waste-water treatment engineering is camed out, eonsidering the active role the engineers have to play in this field. This paper brings together conventional and advanced problems in the field of aerobic biological waste-water treatment. Such an overview of biological waste-water treatment also precedes comments on some important aspects concerning the microorganisms responsible for waste-water treatment as well as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the average of 750 mg l −1 of COD effluent (89.3% removal efficiency), obtained by using the SBR biofilm for treatment of milk industry wastewater at 3 days HRT, showed an effluent concentration decrease with increased HRT. [6] About 35 mg l −1 of effluent COD was obtained with 773 mg l −1 of a synthetic wastewater treated by a sequencing batch biofilm reactor. [19] Findings reported by Bandpi and Bazari [12] for a SBR system treating dairy wastewater achieved COD removal efficiency around 90% with COD concentrations varying from 400 to 2500 mg l −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the average of 750 mg l −1 of COD effluent (89.3% removal efficiency), obtained by using the SBR biofilm for treatment of milk industry wastewater at 3 days HRT, showed an effluent concentration decrease with increased HRT. [6] About 35 mg l −1 of effluent COD was obtained with 773 mg l −1 of a synthetic wastewater treated by a sequencing batch biofilm reactor. [19] Findings reported by Bandpi and Bazari [12] for a SBR system treating dairy wastewater achieved COD removal efficiency around 90% with COD concentrations varying from 400 to 2500 mg l −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Therefore, aerobic methods are generally considered to be more cost effective overall. [1,6] *Correspondence to: Mohamed Abdulgader, Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, Queensland, 4111, Australia. E-mail: m.abdulgader@griffith.edu.au These processes are classified as either attached growth (biofilm) or suspended growth system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nos últimos anos, o grande desenvolvimento da microbiologia tem propiciado muitas alternativas que viabilizam o tratamento biológico de efluentes industriais. Trabalhos recentes têm reportado que uma gama de efluentes são tratáveis por meio destes processos [35][36][37][38][39][40] .…”
Section: Processos Biológicosunclassified
“…Activated sludge process, one of the ways of biological treatment, is commonly used in domestic wastewater treatment, or in the secondary treatment of the industrial wastewater, and over 90% of the municipal wastewater treatment plants use it as the core part of the treatment process [1,2]. The basic function of activated sludge process is to convert organics to carbon dioxide, water and bacterial cells [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%