2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process evaluation of the home performance with ENERGY STAR Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between the HPwES and ENERGY STAR Programs is that HPwES evaluates a process, not a product [70]. More than 1.4 million new homes have earned the ENERGY STAR label, and in 2012 alone, more than 100,000 homes, representing 16 percent of new homes, were constructed to meet ENERGY STAR requirements.…”
Section: The Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the HPwES and ENERGY STAR Programs is that HPwES evaluates a process, not a product [70]. More than 1.4 million new homes have earned the ENERGY STAR label, and in 2012 alone, more than 100,000 homes, representing 16 percent of new homes, were constructed to meet ENERGY STAR requirements.…”
Section: The Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta ha sido una de las estrategias seguidas por ENERGY STAR, que mediante el programa HPwES -Home Performance with Energy Star-(HPwES, 2013), ha mejorado desde el año 2002 más de 275.000 viviendas en Estados Unidos. Más concretamente, el programa NYSERDA ha mejorado más de 11.000 viviendas, ahorrando más de 16.000 MWh de electricidad y 700.000 MMBtu de combustibles fósiles (Tonn et al 2013). En lo referente a ahorros por cada vivienda, el programa de Austin (Texas) de 2007 consiguió ahorros en refrigeración del 25-35%, valorados entre 460 y 640 dólares anuales.…”
Section: Discusión De Resultados Y Comparativa Con Experiencias Similunclassified
“…It is regularly reviewed in a way that with the adoption of a new standard only about a quarter of the produced equipment corresponds to it. According to this the manufacturers, seeking to remain participants in the program, are forced to improve their products investing heavily in research and development and intensifying their efforts in innovation activity [12].…”
Section: Government Programs For the Private Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%